Grover Cleveland vs. Woodrow Wilson (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 18, 2024, 10:43:07 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Grover Cleveland vs. Woodrow Wilson (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who was the better president?
#1
Grover Cleveland
 
#2
Woodrow Wilson
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 55

Author Topic: Grover Cleveland vs. Woodrow Wilson  (Read 2269 times)
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« on: March 23, 2017, 10:49:46 PM »

Cleveland didn't start the most immoral war that is still defended today by a majority of people.

Wilson finished Cleveland's economic policies, solidifying the gold standard with the Federal Reserve. He is the President most responsible for the Great Depression.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2017, 11:49:36 PM »

Cleveland didn't start the most immoral war that is still defended today by a majority of people.
Good point; Gavrilo Princip was certainly a terrible president. I can't think of a single positive accomplishment of his administration; he might as well have never been elected!
*join

WWI had far worse effects than Cleveland's Presidency.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #2 on: March 24, 2017, 06:57:30 PM »

Cleveland didn't start the most immoral war that is still defended today by a majority of people.
Good point; Gavrilo Princip was certainly a terrible president. I can't think of a single positive accomplishment of his administration; he might as well have never been elected!
*join

WWI had far worse effects than Cleveland's Presidency.

But what was Wilson supposed to do? He tried extensively for at least two years to get the Allies & Central Powers to negotiate a peace, to no avail. And it's quite difficult to argue that America's economic power didn't give the Allies the advantage necessary to end the war in Nov. 1918 as opposed to 1921 or whenever.

Without Wilson's Points, Germany wouldn't have been punished so harshly.

Furthermore, if the French mutiny had continued without America showing up, there would eventually either be a German victory an essential tie. Either way prevents the rise of Hitler.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #3 on: March 26, 2017, 12:25:45 AM »

Cleveland was an FF and a friend of the taxpayer; Wilson['s] instituted the income tax and his... second term was a bigger disaster than Cleveland's. Cleveland.
Why on earth would I ever agree with you minus the crossed out part?
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #4 on: March 27, 2017, 08:18:58 AM »

Cleveland deserves credit for not being a dick to weaker nations.
It seems to me many think: Sure, he didn't destroy the losers of a war he barely fought in, but remember his... economic policies which were so bad?

His economic policies weren't even that bad. I don't get why he's worse than an imperialistic, pro-eugenics racist.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.