RINO Tom/Rockefeller GOP v. Santander/Southern Gothic (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 02:17:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community
  Forum Community Election Match-ups (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  RINO Tom/Rockefeller GOP v. Santander/Southern Gothic (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who do you vote for?/Who wins?
#1
RINO Tom/RINO Tom
 
#2
RINO Tom/Santander
 
#3
Santander/RINO Tom
 
#4
Santander/Santander
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 51

Author Topic: RINO Tom/Rockefeller GOP v. Santander/Southern Gothic  (Read 4294 times)
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« on: April 30, 2016, 12:42:47 PM »

A socially left wing(-4.0) and economically centrist(0.0) Republican versus the exact opposite Democrat. Who do you vote for?/Who wins?

Discuss with or without maps.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2016, 09:23:28 AM »

Potential map:

280(R) - 258(D)
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #2 on: May 02, 2016, 06:56:51 PM »

Wow, couple of RINOs in this thread! Tongue
You're the third.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #3 on: May 10, 2016, 06:23:17 PM »


I was being sarcastic, you stupid son of a rhino. Wink

(P. S.: That was sarcasm, too.)


As for RINO Tom/Goldwater, I think Goldwater's libertarian and healthcare views are pretty fairly at odds with Tom's neoliberalism.

In this election, I'd probably support Tom, but his support of people like Bloomberg and Clinton would make it somewhat difficult. Santander's personality is probably a bit more charismatic.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #4 on: May 22, 2016, 01:27:53 PM »

My deepest apologies. I had just heard rumors that got me worried.
Everyone right of center has rumours about them on Atlas. I'm a far-right Neo-Nazi 'centrist' who is only sane compared to the Republicans. Wink
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2016, 05:09:20 PM »

It is WAY too important to you guys' self-inflated images of yourselves and your party to believe what you currently do about Southern realignment, and I'm fine with letting you continue to believe that.
I'm glad you managed to point out the blatant nonsense implied in IceSpear's satire.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #6 on: May 24, 2016, 04:36:03 PM »

Sometimes, I wonder if West Virginia didn't become a GOP stronghold in order to troll RINO Tom haha

I mean, they probably just got tired of voting for a party that had kept them poor for decades. Wink

In that case, Mississippi should dump all their Republicans that have kept them poor for decades.

But we all know why that won't happen...

MS did dump the party that had kept it poor for decades, and it now enjoys GOP control.  If we're going to give both parties an equal shot to fix the mess that is MS, we can check back in in about 80 years.

In all my experience regarding elections in the South, economics is rarely an issue that is stressed. The social divide between Democrats and Republicans is really what it comes down to in our elections. When you look at the platforms of the individual Republican parties, there are entire novels written about opposing the President and pushing for conservative social reform. With maybe a line here or there thrown out about the free market.

Aren't you a self-described socially conservative Democrat?

Socially conservative compared to the national Democrats. Socially liberal compared to Louisiana Democrats

Okay, but did you not just disprove your point?  If LA Democrats are socially conservative, especially compared to a Democrat who's socially conservative compared to the national party, then obviously statewide elections (which is what is relevant here) aren't completely about social issues and highlight at least some economic differences.  People seem to gloss over the '70s, '80s and '90s, but the South was effectively a battleground region.  Republicans didn't gain control of the region until into the 2000s, and they were running against Democrats and losing ... in any election, anywhere, the two candidates are going to highlight their differences.  The Republicans of 2016 I can't speak to, but the Republicans who slowly started defeating Southern Democrats were convincing voters to try something new, and both candidates were pretty much the same on social issues ... eventually, many Southerners did try something new.

Whether you want to deflect this or not, there is a direct relationship between Republicans gaining more power in the South and the region becoming more developed, less poor and less backward.

In case you're looking for proof of this, remember that the Rockefellers were extremely successful as progressive Republicans in Arkansas as late as 2006.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #7 on: June 09, 2016, 03:41:16 PM »

It is so beyond discussion that WV can be considered a Southern state.


If northern Arkansas is red, Missouri is red.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #8 on: June 11, 2016, 10:34:54 AM »


Do you go to Franklin Church?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 13 queries.