Political Trends where you disagree with the Atlas Consensus (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 07:16:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Political Trends where you disagree with the Atlas Consensus (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Political Trends where you disagree with the Atlas Consensus  (Read 10550 times)
libertpaulian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,611
United States


« on: September 03, 2017, 06:36:14 PM »
Quote from: slightlyburnttoast on September 02, 2017, 08:38:03 PM
Iowa will be easier for the Democratic nominee to win than Ohio (for the next couple presidential elections).
That one is a downright headscratcher.  Iowa is whiter than Ohio is, which helps the GOP.
Logged
libertpaulian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,611
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2017, 08:21:37 AM »
Quote from: Skunk on September 04, 2017, 10:38:12 AM
New Hampshire isn't going to become Safe D.
That's only a consensus among TN Volunteer/MT Treasurer and Heisenberg.  It's not a general Atlas consensus, IMO.
Logged
libertpaulian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,611
United States


« Reply #2 on: September 05, 2017, 08:23:12 AM »
-The next realignment will be a Bernie-esque populist one

-VA, NV, and CO will become Safe D in the 2020s/2030s

-The Rust Belt is gone from the Dems forever
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 12 queries.