AFL/CIO says Gephardt is a "done deal" for VP (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 10:32:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  AFL/CIO says Gephardt is a "done deal" for VP (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: AFL/CIO says Gephardt is a "done deal" for VP  (Read 6497 times)
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


« on: June 14, 2004, 04:19:49 PM »

People need to stop using WSJ op-ed talking points.

I see you're still looking for a new argument.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2004, 04:32:12 PM »

Gephardt at least gives Kerry a shot at winning Missouri, he certainly wouldn't gain anything by choosing Edwards.  Gephardt's main problem is that he is old discarded news and therefore is a bigger risk than Edwards.

Gev. Richardson (NM) is Kerry's best choice.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2004, 04:49:36 PM »
« Edited: June 14, 2004, 04:51:00 PM by jmfcst »

Sen. Max Cleland as a possible choice? he could really help in the south and good be popular nationwide. The fact that he was defeated in his reelection bid was because of one of the nastier and mean spirited campaigns ever.

Cleland would have lost regardless of the spriit of the campaign.  He didn't vote with Bush on a couple of key votes and the people thriew him out of office 53-46%.  The GOP absolutely romped in Georgia in 2002!

Losing three limbs, although highly heroic, doesn't mean you have any special right to be reelected.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2004, 12:20:24 PM »

Trade at best amounts to short term economic gains though supression of inflation at the expense of long term ecobomic growth meaning stagnating median(note I did not say average) incomes.

Yeah, I guess that is why median income families have been able to markedly increase their standard of living since the vast majority of this group owns two or more color TVs, a computer, at least one car, etc, etc, etc.

Their incomes may have remained stagnat, but their dollars buy a whole lot more.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.