Is OWS just another name for "the opebos"? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2024, 08:47:27 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Is OWS just another name for "the opebos"? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Is OWS just another name for "the opebos"?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
#3
please, not another forum personality based meme
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 23

Author Topic: Is OWS just another name for "the opebos"?  (Read 1415 times)
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


« on: December 01, 2011, 12:42:04 PM »

go...
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


« Reply #1 on: December 02, 2011, 10:47:38 AM »

With opebo's attitude toward working and discomfort I have a tough time seeing him attend a protest unless it'd make it easier for him to find hookers. He certainly wouldn't sleep in an OWS sort of setup. So no, not at all.

good point....ok, OWS does NOT equate to the opebos...

...so that takes us to the follow-up queston:  do the opebos exist, and if so, which segment of society are they?

Note:  you have to represent at least 0.5% of society in order to get your own meme
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


« Reply #2 on: December 02, 2011, 02:58:44 PM »


I can't imagine 1.5 million Americans thus affected.

opebo is singularly affected.  a zero in the denominator of an otherwise harmonious equation. If the world is 1/(x-a), where is x is an element of the set of real numbers, then opebo is x=a.  Here, there is only one real value of x which makes the world undefined.  Note that x=a is real, but the world has no defined functional value at the point of his existence, and because of his existence.  Not indeterminant (as the numerator still makes sense), just undefined.  There is only one such singularity, so the plural form of opebo is neither necessary nor desirable.

basically, you're saying opebo is politically irrelevant...ok, I can agree with that and will drop the plural form of opebo from my forum vocabulary until his lack of relevance is proven otherwise
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


« Reply #3 on: December 02, 2011, 03:17:56 PM »

But, yeah, more or less as relevant as 1 in 300 million, so not very relevant.

but a single voter of a single mindset is pretty irrelevant, therefore,



opebo = opebos, since opebo is the only member within the domain of opebos

and since jmfcsts >> jmfcst, since there are many many jmfcst's within the domain of the jmfcsts

opebo <<  jmfcsts on the political revelance scale
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


« Reply #4 on: December 02, 2011, 03:32:46 PM »

But beware, the multi-decade trend is probably something like  opebo<<<<CARLHAYDEN<<<angus=jmfcst

glad to know you'll be joining us...see you in church soon
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 12 queries.