Why was Colorado still looked at as a swing state/competitive in 2016? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 30, 2024, 11:33:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Why was Colorado still looked at as a swing state/competitive in 2016? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why was Colorado still looked at as a swing state/competitive in 2016?  (Read 568 times)
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,782


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


« on: July 24, 2023, 05:52:15 PM »

There was actually a huge forum meme in 2015/early 2016 about Colorado being Likely R in 2016 due to Hillary being a terrible fit for the state.

I'd also add that suburban trends were much more ambiguous and not treated in the way they are now before 2016.  In fact, most suburbs had trended pretty significantly to the right in the early 2010s (the 2010, 2012, and 2014 elections).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.