The Seriously? Theatre of Absurdity, Ignorance, and Bad Posts V (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 04:19:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  The Seriously? Theatre of Absurdity, Ignorance, and Bad Posts V (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Seriously? Theatre of Absurdity, Ignorance, and Bad Posts V  (Read 208083 times)
Higgs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Political Matrix
E: 6.14, S: -4.17

« on: March 08, 2016, 02:19:24 PM »

It appears that "just saying no" did not prevent the Devil from collecting Mrs. Reagan soul.
Logged
Higgs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Political Matrix
E: 6.14, S: -4.17

« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2016, 11:43:38 PM »

Logged
Higgs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Political Matrix
E: 6.14, S: -4.17

« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2016, 02:26:31 PM »

Probably the worst case for Sanders, he would do much better, although a lot can change in 222 days.
270 Sanders
191 Kasich
77 tossup
If Kasich were to get the nomination (highly unlikely), Sanders would still have a week to convince super delegates that nominating Clinton wouldn't be worth the risk (although I doubt that he could do that since 2/3 of the supers are currently supporting Clinton. Still we can all dream). Clinton wouldn't do as well as Sanders, and might even lose, according to current polls. She trails Kasich in popular but not necessarily electoral votes, she might win the same states plus Nevada, although she might lose Ohio:


Logged
Higgs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Political Matrix
E: 6.14, S: -4.17

« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2016, 09:06:55 PM »

Probably the worst case for Sanders, he would do much better, although a lot can change in 222 days.
270 Sanders
191 Kasich
77 tossup
If Kasich were to get the nomination (highly unlikely), Sanders would still have a week to convince super delegates that nominating Clinton wouldn't be worth the risk (although I doubt that he could do that since 2/3 of the supers are currently supporting Clinton. Still we can all dream). Clinton wouldn't do as well as Sanders, and might even lose, according to current polls. She trails Kasich in popular but not necessarily electoral votes, she might win the same states plus Nevada, although she might lose Ohio:



there's nothing absurd about that post. i would've thought a connoisseur of absurdity such as yourself would have realised that.

That post is very absurd. Bernie is not getting 270 EVs in his worst case scenario, anyone with a shred of common knowledge ought to know that.
Logged
Higgs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Political Matrix
E: 6.14, S: -4.17

« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2016, 09:07:26 PM »

Hillary, Trump, and Cruz are all pretty unlikable people.
Yet, Clinton supporters claim, without good argument, that she is more "electable" than Sanders. The biggest myth about Clinton, of course.

Wait until he truly is in the national spotlight, if he even gets that lucky.
That's the problem. A lot of people haven't voted for him in the primaries because they don't know who he is. The more people know about him, the more likely they are to vote for him.

Found another
Logged
Higgs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Political Matrix
E: 6.14, S: -4.17

« Reply #5 on: June 12, 2016, 12:07:34 PM »

Trump's base must be totally conflicted about this.  On one hand, a radical Islamist just murdered 50 people on American soil.  But on the other hand, they were gay, so...

This, combined with his awful opinions on the Cincinnati zoo issue, have truly made Joe Republic an HP in my mind.
Logged
Higgs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Political Matrix
E: 6.14, S: -4.17

« Reply #6 on: June 12, 2016, 12:16:14 PM »

Thats ok, I'm not concerned about the opinions of blue avatars.  You have problems of your own!

Ok?
Logged
Higgs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Political Matrix
E: 6.14, S: -4.17

« Reply #7 on: June 12, 2016, 12:27:02 PM »

... As in, maybe you should worry about your party's nominee more than my post pointing out how terrible he and his voters are?  I'd have thought you'd agree with me rather than repost it here... unless you consider yourself part of Trump's base now (your avatar color notwithstanding)?

I certainly disagree with you that Trump voters wouldn't care about the loss of 50 innocent lives (and potentially more) just because they're gay. It seems like you get a real hard on for the supposed bigotry of all of Trump's base.
Logged
Higgs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Political Matrix
E: 6.14, S: -4.17

« Reply #8 on: August 05, 2016, 12:58:02 AM »
« Edited: August 05, 2016, 01:03:04 AM by Higgs »

STOP ARGUING

And I'm sorry to say this, but RI is right. That post didn't belong here.

Blatant transphobia is OK in your book now?
Your definition of "blatant" is a bit off, and I say that as someone who actually for the most part is on your side of this politically.

He did say that people should be permanently barred from entering bathrooms of their gender identity.

Also, it might help to be more aware of realisticidealist's posting history.

I completely agree with you on this issue, but it may serve you some good to think of other people's perspectives on the issue and realize it isn't always as black and white as you think it is. Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they're a bigot/_____phobe. You don't know his reasoning, so you can't make that judgement. Also, do you really think you're going to convince anyone or win the debate by calling the opposing side trans phobic? That's not helping our side, you're only hurting us.
Logged
Higgs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Political Matrix
E: 6.14, S: -4.17

« Reply #9 on: October 03, 2016, 05:12:39 PM »

Nothing wrong with the post.  Most racists support Trump.

The inference was "all", not "most". Take a research methods course or something.
Dude, please keeping being a douche, really makes people like you.

And I did look at context, yeah BRTD was being racist in the thread.

Hilarious since you are one of the only posters who, on a daily basis, acts snarky and douchy.
Honey, if someone didn't have to act like an asshole, I wouldn't be a douche to them.  Sorry if that makes you or others unhappy.

Why do you call people honey all the time?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 11 queries.