Opinion of jaichind

[President Punxsutawney Phil]

Said he’d be into human trafficking if it wasn’t for the legal ramifications and also said he supports the Axis over the Allies, says it all

He never said this.

[President Punxsutawney Phil]

Said he’d be into human trafficking if it wasn’t for the legal ramifications and also said he supports the Axis over the Allies, says it all

He never said this.

You are technically correct in that he said that he is "fairly empathetic to the Axis point of view" but that distinction is so technical that its odd you highlight it.

My reading of that post was that he viewed himself as being understanding to the Axis POV while ultimately siding against them. The overall post never said anything suggesting (when read together with everything else) "in general the Axis was right". It was also prefaced with "while" which already functions as a built-in caveat in this context.
To make up lies about jaichind's politics to make them look worse is so patently unnecessary. And said lies don't suddenly become true no matter how many people agree with said lies or express agreement with them.

[President Punxsutawney Phil]

Said he’d be into human trafficking if it wasn’t for the legal ramifications and also said he supports the Axis over the Allies, says it all

He never said this.

You are technically correct in that he said that he is "fairly empathetic to the Axis point of view" but that distinction is so technical that its odd you highlight it.

My reading of that post was that he viewed himself as being understanding to the Axis POV while ultimately siding against them. The overall post never said anything suggesting (when read together with everything else) "in general the Axis was right". It was also prefaced with "while" which already functions as a built-in caveat in this context.
To make up lies about jaichind's politics to make them look worse is so patently unnecessary. And said lies don't suddenly become true no matter how many people agree with said lies or express agreement with them.

There is absolutely nothing about his history that suggests the comment in question should be given this beyond generous interpretation

I mean, I saw that post, I probably even replied to it. I know what's in it.
You just want to assume the worst about it by reading something into it that isn't actually there.
Which is your right, but I'm calling it out for what it is.

[President Punxsutawney Phil]

Said he’d be into human trafficking if it wasn’t for the legal ramifications and also said he supports the Axis over the Allies, says it all

He never said this.

You are technically correct in that he said that he is "fairly empathetic to the Axis point of view" but that distinction is so technical that its odd you highlight it.

My reading of that post was that he viewed himself as being understanding to the Axis POV while ultimately siding against them. The overall post never said anything suggesting (when read together with everything else) "in general the Axis was right". It was also prefaced with "while" which already functions as a built-in caveat in this context.
To make up lies about jaichind's politics to make them look worse is so patently unnecessary. And said lies don't suddenly become true no matter how many people agree with said lies or express agreement with them.

There is absolutely nothing about his history that suggests the comment in question should be given this beyond generous interpretation

I mean, I saw that post, I probably even replied to it. I know what's in it.
You just want to assume the worst about it by reading something into it that isn't actually there.
Which is your right, but I'm calling it out for what it is.

How is saying he’s pro-Axis an unfair reading of him saying he’s “ fairly empathetic to the Axis point of view”

If you look at the whole post in context it's pretty clear it's not actually saying what you think it's saying. He used the word 'while' to start that sentence which already hurts your claims.
It's one thing to automatically view Jaichind's politics negatively, that's perfectly understandable and I do don't favor them either. If you said that you very much dislike his politics a lot then I would have no quibbles with that whatsoever. Automatically viewing someone's remarks in the worst possible light and picking out eight words out of a post significantly longer than that and reducing it down to that is, however, disingenuous lying, whether you realize it or not.
Most likely you've lied to yourself. I know what I saw and it's not what you think you saw.