Future of the GOP (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 03:32:02 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Future of the GOP (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: How does the GOP remain viable going forward? Check all that apply (up to 5)
#1
Try to put together a "pre-Trump" coalition to bring back moderates
 
#2
Go full-bore on WWC and disaffected voters: "out-Trump" Trump
 
#3
Adopt a quasi-libertarian position, to bring in younger voters
 
#4
Build on their growing success with Blacks, Hispanics, Asians by stressing opportunity and safety
 
#5
NOTA. The party is moribund. The future of America is Democrats plus minor parties
 
#6
Other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 67

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Future of the GOP  (Read 3575 times)
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,276
United States


« on: December 16, 2020, 04:05:50 PM »

Also, the idea that the Reagan administration at any point prioritized social conservatism in anything other than occasional lip service, empty promises (e.g. the appointment of evangelicals to the administration in proportion to their numbers in the population, a constitutional amendment allowing reestablishment of prayer in schools, etc.), and inspirational rhetoric in front of favorable audiences or that Reagan was genuinely interested in the causes and concerns of the Religious Right rather than their votes is laughable. Reagan played Falwell and other leaders of the New Right like a fiddle and they completely fell for it, e.g. when he assured Falwell that Sandra Day O'Connor would be a reliable conservative vote on the Court even when it was blatantly obvious (including to other Christian Right leaders/social conservatives like Robertson) that this was obviously not the case (and clearly not borne out by her judicial record).

The Republican ‘establishment’ has no one but itself to blame for its ‘angry’ and ‘disillusioned’ base when it has treated many of those people with contempt for decades or left their concerns unaddressed even when Republican presidents had the political capital and power to move those issues forward.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 14 queries.