Why is Heitkamp so vulnerable... (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 02:14:07 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Why is Heitkamp so vulnerable... (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why is Heitkamp so vulnerable...  (Read 2741 times)
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,275
United States


« on: October 23, 2018, 09:53:49 AM »

It does seem weird which suggests there is a polling error one way or another, either Heitkamp is losing by less(maybe low single digits) or McCaskill and Donnelly are more vulnerable and are underwater. After all Iowa polling a lot to the right of Wisconsin and Michigan etc ultimately did prove to be a bellwether and indicator Clinton would have trouble in her firewall.

I pretty much agree, this is definitely an underrated possibility. No doubt she’s the most vulnerable red state Democrat, but she’s not going to lose by 15+ points while McCaskill, Donnelly, and Tester cruise to reelection simultaneously.

McCaskill and Donnelly are certainly vulnerable too.

I think it's a mistake to leave Tester out. He does have the edge, but people seem to forget that not much high-quality polling has been done in MT and the few polls that are out there show a race in the low single-digits. Hardly something to take for granted.

jfern loves bold progressives/#populists Purple heart like Tester, you see.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 8 queries.