The Perot factor must have been HUGE in the mountain west in 1992. Clinton won Montana and lost Wyoming of all places by 5 points, despite the Mountain West's anti Clinton voting patterns afterwards.
That's right, even though the Dems still believe that the Perot vote split 50-50 which is wrong. It helped elect Clinton by a larger margin.
Montana is bet-the-house-sure NOT in play, not anymore than Connecticut and Vermont are, anyway. This all looks a lot like 2012 to me. I bet Arizona wouldn't really be in play for her either, at least not as long as the most populated part of the state is content with that psychotic sheriff.
"Hillary's losing Montana!!!!!" and "Hillary's under 60!!!!!!" is just cheerleading.
Some Hillary supporters are still fantasizing about her winning this state against the "GOP clown car".