MS-S/NBC-Marist: Hyde-Smith in the lead, wins Runoff (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 11:38:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2018 Senatorial Election Polls
  MS-S/NBC-Marist: Hyde-Smith in the lead, wins Runoff (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MS-S/NBC-Marist: Hyde-Smith in the lead, wins Runoff  (Read 5424 times)
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,641
Israel


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 4.26


« on: October 23, 2018, 04:30:34 PM »

lol

And if it were just Hyde-Smith vs. Espy in a normal November election, there's a slight chance the race could slip under the radar and Espy could pull it off with a big enthusiasm gap. 
No, because this is Mississippi, aka inelastic af.
Logged
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,641
Israel


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 4.26


« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2018, 04:46:06 PM »

This has some serious AL-SEN 2017 potential in the runoff, especially if Republicans stay home, so don’t count your chickens before they are hatched. AL was also considered "inelastic" before Jones won, and pretty much nobody thought Hogan would be able to win in a landslide because of Maryland's "inelasticity", so "inelastic" is a term just as nebulous/meaningless as "candidate quality".
AL was exceptional because of Roy Moore and his unique scandals. As long as Cindy Hyde-Smith doesn't turn out to have a similarly murky past, she will be fine.
Logged
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,641
Israel


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 4.26


« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2018, 05:10:27 PM »

This has some serious AL-SEN 2017 potential in the runoff, especially if Republicans stay home, so don’t count your chickens before they are hatched. AL was also considered "inelastic" before Jones won, and pretty much nobody thought Hogan would be able to win in a landslide because of Maryland's "inelasticity", so "inelastic" is a term just as nebulous/meaningless as "candidate quality".
AL was exceptional because of Roy Moore and his unique scandals. As long as Cindy Hyde-Smith doesn't turn out to have a similarly murky past, she will be fine.
The enthusiasm gap/turnout differential played a key role as well, and Democrats have a much higher floor in MS than AL. I’m not saying she’ll lose, but she’s not Romney-level safe.
You were saying it's a tossup. It's not. It's likely R.
Logged
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,641
Israel


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 4.26


« Reply #3 on: October 23, 2018, 05:21:32 PM »

You were saying it's a tossup. It's not. It's likely R.

Yes, everyone’s entitled to their own ratings, and I generally like to be cautious when there’s a lot of uncertainty involved.
I get that. But saying it's a tossup is really pushing it. Lean R I can understand. And of course you decide on your own ratings. Feel free to make it safe D for all I care. But if you're going to say it here, people will respond to it (and let's be honest, that's what you want too).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.