Abortion is murder and an act of aggression. The only line I draw is where I believe life begins at conception. If I was pro-choice, I would still argue that a women does not have the soul right to eradicate the fetus. It would be a two-way system with the man giving consent.
Why should a man's consent be needed to have an abortion in any scenario? Any pro-choice view would recognize a women's bodily autonomy in this case.
Because a man helped conceive the organism within the woman. He holds 50 percent of the decision making in my eyes
Totally agree with the last quote.
He's not the one who has to give birth and carry the fetus for nine months.