The thing about "pro-life" vs. "pro-choice" identity though is that people define those terms differently and they may not perfectly predict how they actually vote on these bans. Like clearly Kentucky rejected banning abortion in the state constitution last year even though "pro-life" won in that poll in the state easily.
I think the NYTimes estimation of how states would vote after the Kansas referendum is a better barometer:
Also pre Dobbs , someone could be considered pro Life if they supported a 12-15 week ban even if they opposed a 6 week ban since that policy would be more pro life than what was allowed under Roe . Now the question is what position do they dislike more between : “ban after 0-6 weeks” , “allow for at least the first 24 weeks” and most of them dislike the 0-6 week position more .
