Is Hawley's populist bet a good strategy? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 17, 2024, 01:01:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  2024 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, GeorgiaModerate, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Is Hawley's populist bet a good strategy? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Is Hawley's populist bet a good strategy?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 41

Author Topic: Is Hawley's populist bet a good strategy?  (Read 1987 times)
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,563


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

« on: December 12, 2020, 03:01:39 PM »

No cause DeSantis will easily take this lane , and even Rubio has a better chance of taking this lane as he has much better name recoginition
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,563


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2020, 03:05:40 PM »

Yes, and establishment Democrats have no answer to this.

What answers do populists like Trump and Hawley have? Did he bring back the jobs he promised? Did he make coal great again? What did they do about China other than imposing some tariffs? A comprehensive strategy? I have to confess, I can't see it. All they have is tax breaks for the super wealthy, deregulation for big banks and denial about climate change.

The populism may a good strategy in the short term to win elections (not saying it will), but it doesn't solve the major problems, because they need more than a few tariffs and campaign slogans on a bumper sticker.

Well you could make an argument that without the freedom caucus the tax plan would have been much more populist. Ryan and Trump had originally put in place a 20% Border Adjustment Tax to go along with the corporate tax cut but the freedom caucus killed that proposal.

https://taxfoundation.org/understanding-house-gop-border-adjustment/

Doing so would have made the Tax Reform close to Revenue Neutral too
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 15 queries.