Why was Oregon so close? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 02:38:01 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why was Oregon so close? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why was Oregon so close?  (Read 2691 times)
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,526


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

« on: March 16, 2020, 08:33:35 PM »

Oregon wasn’t / isn’t as far left as people think. It was legit swing state in the Bush 43 elections. Clinton got higher margins because he was really popular, and there was Perot.

Obama in 2008 pulled away in that big 2008 year, and he maintained his coalition in 2012. Hillary saw the vote totals go back to normal for the Dems, but it seems Trump wasn’t a good fit for the state (got less votes than Romney did here).

If the Republicans could ever pull off a solid 4-5%  nationwide win (which they haven’t done since 1988), then Oregon is a state that will surely go for them. This state isn’t like Massachusetts, New York, or Washington D.C.


Republicans need at least a 7-8 point win nationally to win Oregon and even then it would basically be to them what Indiana was to Obama in 2008
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,526


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2020, 08:46:00 PM »

Oregon wasn’t / isn’t as far left as people think. It was legit swing state in the Bush 43 elections. Clinton got higher margins because he was really popular, and there was Perot.

Obama in 2008 pulled away in that big 2008 year, and he maintained his coalition in 2012. Hillary saw the vote totals go back to normal for the Dems, but it seems Trump wasn’t a good fit for the state (got less votes than Romney did here).

If the Republicans could ever pull off a solid 4-5%  nationwide win (which they haven’t done since 1988), then Oregon is a state that will surely go for them. This state isn’t like Massachusetts, New York, or Washington D.C.


Republicans need at least a 7-8 point win nationally to win Oregon and even then it would basically be to them what Indiana was to Obama in 2008

Nah, it’s not that far Democrat. The Republicans finish respectably in the governor and senator races here. Oregon to the Republicans is like Georgia to the Democrats.

The Indiana comparison would be more apt for New Jersey. Republicans would need a 2008-like win to get NJ barely.

I don’t think they would win NJ with even that I think they would need a 1980 style win for that . Anyway Oregon has consistently been around 7-8 points more dem since 2004 with the exception of 2008.


I think Kasich very much could have won OR in 2016 as I think he could have won a 53-46 win nationally against Hillary and Stein would do much better as well.


Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 14 queries.