Data For Progress: Sanders +2 in NC, Sanders +9 in TX (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 02:00:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Data For Progress: Sanders +2 in NC, Sanders +9 in TX (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Data For Progress: Sanders +2 in NC, Sanders +9 in TX  (Read 5640 times)
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,313


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

« on: February 28, 2020, 11:49:48 PM »

Bloomberg is hurting Biden big
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,313


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2020, 02:00:04 AM »

Sanders can theoretically afford to do as bad (or at least close to it) as he did in the Confederacy: as long as he keeps the Southern periphery in check, it's fine (not to mention CA's effects). Clinton won TX 2:1 in 2016: even if Sanders loses slightly, it's really not a big deal, as he'll be taking 50+ delegates net away from a candidate like Biden. The only major contest where he's likely to get rat-f[inks]ked is FL.

Little known fact: Sanders won more delegates outside the Confederacy in 2016 than Clinton:

Non-Confederates:
Sanders   1448
Clinton   1432

Confederates:
Clinton   700
Sanders   332

This is why the other candidates need to stay in the race to deny Sanders the majority of the Non-Confederate delegates.
The Confederate delegates are already strongly Anti-Sanders.

Based on the South Carolina results, we can conclude with certainty that the undecided voters or late deciders are Anti-Sanders and that they will break for Biden. That means that Biden may even win Texas.

It still wouldn't stop him from winning the largest share. I know you'd love this, but if Sanders goes into the convention with the most delegates and gets denied the nomination, 5,000,000 Democratic votes in the margin disappear overnight and the election is over. Trumps gets 330+ EVs and possibly a majority of the PV to boot.
Could you be more of a hack?

Literally a Democratic Party officer, so I probably have more of a reason to cuddle up to THE BRAND than you - yet you somehow beat me at it! That's the definition of a hack.

If you don't see how a million or more people will flip their ballots out of spite + another 2-3 million will either stay home (punishing all candidates), vote third party or otherwise leave the contest blank, then you're a delusional hack at that.


It is not unfair at all for Bernie to be denied the nomination. If you neither party won a majority in the House they would have to make deals with a third party to elect their party leader Speaker, and the 2nd place party can get the speakership as well
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,313


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2020, 02:07:31 AM »

Sanders can theoretically afford to do as bad (or at least close to it) as he did in the Confederacy: as long as he keeps the Southern periphery in check, it's fine (not to mention CA's effects). Clinton won TX 2:1 in 2016: even if Sanders loses slightly, it's really not a big deal, as he'll be taking 50+ delegates net away from a candidate like Biden. The only major contest where he's likely to get rat-f[inks]ked is FL.

Little known fact: Sanders won more delegates outside the Confederacy in 2016 than Clinton:

Non-Confederates:
Sanders   1448
Clinton   1432

Confederates:
Clinton   700
Sanders   332

This is why the other candidates need to stay in the race to deny Sanders the majority of the Non-Confederate delegates.
The Confederate delegates are already strongly Anti-Sanders.

Based on the South Carolina results, we can conclude with certainty that the undecided voters or late deciders are Anti-Sanders and that they will break for Biden. That means that Biden may even win Texas.

It still wouldn't stop him from winning the largest share. I know you'd love this, but if Sanders goes into the convention with the most delegates and gets denied the nomination, 5,000,000 Democratic votes in the margin disappear overnight and the election is over. Trumps gets 330+ EVs and possibly a majority of the PV to boot.
Could you be more of a hack?

Literally a Democratic Party officer, so I probably have more of a reason to cuddle up to THE BRAND than you - yet you somehow beat me at it! That's the definition of a hack.

If you don't see how a million or more people will flip their ballots out of spite + another 2-3 million will either stay home (punishing all candidates), vote third party or otherwise leave the contest blank, then you're a delusional hack at that.


It is not unfair at all for Bernie to be denied the nomination. If you neither party won a majority in the House they would have to make deals with a third party to elect their party leader Speaker, and the 2nd place party can get the speakership as well

If I wanted third-grade level political analysis from a 25 year-old, I'd go down to the insane asylum and interpret a drooling vegetable's hand gestures.

Well than its your fault for not understanding basic third-grade concept of Most does not equal Majority.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,313


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2020, 02:16:20 AM »

Here's a good analogy . Say you are organizing a party and you are trying to get ice cream for the party but you find out the place your renting out will only let you choose one flavor of ice cream to give out to your guests at the party so you decide to do a survey and find out what people want.


You find out that 40% favorite flavor is Vanilla

35% favorite flavor is Chocolate

7% favorite flavor is Chocolate Chip

another favorite  7% flavor is Chocolate Fudge

5% favorite  flavor  Vanilla Bean

4% favorite  flavor Chocolate Brownie

2% is Strawberry



By Sanders folks logic you should order Vanilla since thats what most of the people's favorite flavor is but that doesnt make any sense because 53% of the people at the party is some variant of chocolate flavor. So the logical thing to do is order chocolate
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,313


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

« Reply #4 on: March 01, 2020, 02:22:50 AM »

Here's a good analogy . Say you are organizing a party and you are trying to get ice cream for the party but you find out the place your renting out will only let you choose one flavor of ice cream to give out to your guests at the party so you decide to do a survey and find out what people want.


You find out that 40% favorite flavor is Vanilla

35% favorite flavor is Chocolate

7% favorite flavor is Chocolate Chip

another favorite  7% flavor is Chocolate Fudge

5% favorite  flavor  Vanilla Bean

4% favorite  flavor Chocolate Brownie

2% is Strawberry



By Sanders folks logic you should order Vanilla since thats what most of the people's favorite flavor is but that doesnt make any sense because 53% of the people at the party is some variant of chocolate flavor. So the logical thing to do is order chocolate


What happens when Chocolate chip people want vanilla as their 2nd choice?

Well there is no sure way to find that out(Since the survey only asks for your first choice) so the best way is to look at what flavor out of the top 2 the lesser flavors are most similar too.


Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,313


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

« Reply #5 on: March 01, 2020, 02:28:53 AM »

I guarantee I have more Dem party credibility than you, but let's set that aside. A million people ARE NOT flipping their ballots if, for example, Sanders comes to the convention with 45% of the delegates, Biden comes with 40%, and Biden gets the nomination. There is no data backing this up. It's uncharted territory--but so is a contested convention. That said, it is clear that regular Democrats do not listen to TYT, do not have a devotion to Bernie Sanders, and are not willing to risk another 4 years of Trump over petty progressive petulance. Also, nice shift from 5 million to 1 million, but you should probably slash the margin 5x over again (and then pad the margin the other way with all the people who vote Biden but not Sanders.) In that vein, there is no empirical evidence that Bernie will inspire millions to turn out who would otherwise stay home. Conversely, it's pretty clear Biden gets higher AA turnout than Sanders and would get better margins among future former Republicans than Sanders in the places Dems absolutely have to win like the Research Triangle, North Atlanta Suburbs, Maricopa County, South Florida, Oakland County, and SEPA. You have drunk so much Bernie cool aid that you're completely unaware of how he is percieved off rose twitter.

Once you've held county party office, congressional party office and served as a DNC delegate, get back with me. If you can best me at a decade of organizing within the party in official capacity, field ops, leadership roles and the like, I'd love to hear about it, Mister Lurker! Otherwise, you can't outshow me without showing your cards.

I spend plenty of time around actual voters who look like the median American electorate. We can't all live around a bunch of privileged Bay Area t[inks]ts. I don't use Twitter because for both Roses and Donuts alike, it rots the brain.

All the evidence you need is to look at what happened in 2016: millions stayed home after Sanders lost fair and square, and the party nominated somebody uninspiring (most was due to the latter). What kind of backlash do you think is going to happen if Sanders comes into that convention with the most delegates and gets denied? It's going to be a magnitude above 2016 in terms of Sanders supporters tactically and spitefully punishing the party through one of several methods, not to mention the normies who just don't show up because Joe Biden or whomever is an uninspiring dullard of a candidate.

The rest isn't worth responding to because I've been addressing it (in particular, the notion that black turnout and support can somehow be changed) all night long in other threads, and I'm done repeating myself to the dullards about how intensely strong trends stretching back 20+ years work.

I just love how Bernie Supporters forget that Bernie stayed in 2016 long after there was no chance he had in getting the most pledged delegates because he said he would make a case to the Super Delegates to vote for him.


Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,313


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

« Reply #6 on: March 01, 2020, 02:34:42 AM »

Here's a good analogy . Say you are organizing a party and you are trying to get ice cream for the party but you find out the place your renting out will only let you choose one flavor of ice cream to give out to your guests at the party so you decide to do a survey and find out what people want.


You find out that 40% favorite flavor is Vanilla

35% favorite flavor is Chocolate

7% favorite flavor is Chocolate Chip

another favorite  7% flavor is Chocolate Fudge

5% favorite  flavor  Vanilla Bean

4% favorite  flavor Chocolate Brownie

2% is Strawberry



By Sanders folks logic you should order Vanilla since thats what most of the people's favorite flavor is but that doesnt make any sense because 53% of the people at the party is some variant of chocolate flavor. So the logical thing to do is order chocolate


What happens when Chocolate chip people want vanilla as their 2nd choice?

Well there is no sure way to find that out(Since the survey only asks for your first choice) so the best way is to look at what flavor out of the top 2 the lesser flavors are most similar too.



The problem is fairness which is a subjective concept is irrelevant here. Whether you think it’s fair or not for Sanders to be denied the nomination when he has a plurality of delegates dissent matter. If that situation should arise I’m certain a majority of Sanders supporters will be angered and absolutely think it’s unfair leading to a non insignificant amount of them to either stay home altogether or vote third party for President. 

Biden supporters and Centrists will be angered too if their bloc as the most votes and they are denied.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 14 queries.