Describe Obama 08/Romney 12/Hillary 16/Trump 2020 voters

[OSR stands with Israel]

I know a few and their reasons for voting this way as well so describe these types of voters . These people by the way said if they could have voted in 2000 and 2004 they would have voted for Gore in 2000 and Bush in 2004(their feelings at the time , not with hindsight )

[OSR stands with Israel]

A disaffected white, working-class Democrat from Arkansas who supported Bill Clinton's runs for Governor and President, voted Kerry '04, and supported Hillary Clinton in the 2008 primaries, but reluctantly voted for Obama's message of "Hope and Change" in 2008. Disappointed by slow economic recovery, the voter fell for Republican efforts to "make Obama a one-term President" in 2012, but "came home" (I hate that term in 2016 to vote for Hillary. Having seen the economy remain stable and having been energized by Trump speaking on behalf of the angry white man, this voter intends to vote Trump in 2020 and will remain Republican thereafter.

No did you not read my description lol , they supported Bush in 2004 not Kerry but they couldn’t vote though cause they weren’t eligible yet to do so.

[OSR stands with Israel]

Who in their right mind would vote for Bush against Kerry with hindsight? I honestly doubt the validity of these voters you mention lol.

It’s not with hindsight , it’s their feelings at the time . They supported Gore in 2000 and Bush in 2004 but weren’t eligible to vote either time

[OSR stands with Israel]

I’ll give a couple hint :

- they aren’t neo cons and while they may  prefer establishment politicians they don’t like them either . If they were neo con establishment voters they would have voted for McCain in 2008.


-This isn’t really hard as many of you are making it out to be , and if you just look at the years it will become really obvious.

[OSR stands with Israel]

Someone who always vote for the incumbent

Nope

[OSR stands with Israel]

Someone who always vote for the incumbent*

Nope

*provided a good economy

Yup that’s the correct answer , they said they will vote to re-elect the party in the White House if the economy is doing well , if it was doing bad they will vote for the opposite party . 2004 they said was the one exception where they would have (if they could have voted ) where they would have taken into account something  other than the economy into account .


The answer to this I thought was pretty obvious, in 2000(if they could have voted ), 2016, and for now in 2020 the economy is/was doing well so they supported the incumbent party , in 2008 and 2012 the economy was doing bad so they supported the opposition party and 2004 was ambiguous but the economy wasn’t doing badly either and terrorism was a huge issue so they voted for the incumbent party

[OSR stands with Israel]

Someone who always vote for the incumbent*

Nope

*provided a good economy

Yup that’s the correct answer , they said they will vote to re-elect the party in the White House if the economy is doing well , if it was doing bad they will vote for the opposite party . 2004 they said was the one exception where they would have (if they could have voted ) where they would have taken into account something  other than the economy into account .


The answer to this I thought was pretty obvious, in 2000(if they could have voted ), 2016, and for now in 2020 the economy is/was doing well so they supported the incumbent party , in 2008 and 2012 the economy was doing bad so they supported the opposition party and 2004 was ambiguous but the economy wasn’t doing badly either and terrorism was a huge issue so they voted for the incumbent party

^Uh...

Voters attracted to "establishment" candidates who prioritize national security/stability + the economy

Well you should have taken out the establishment part lol as if they wouldn’t support Obama in 2008 or  Trump in 2020.