Edited to improve compactness (and potential legality issues)
New 2016 vote share:
01 - D 57.1, R 42.9
02 - D 31.0, R 69.0
03 - D 26.2, R 73.8
04 - D 47.2, R 52.8
05 - D 25.1, R 74.9
06 - D 50.6, R 49.4
07 - D 57.0, R 43.0
08 - D 46.7, R 53.3
09 - D 40.5, R 59.5
10 - D 30.4, R 69.6
11 - D 48.8, R 51.2
12 - D 50.4, R 49.6
13 - D 51.3, R 48.7
14 - D 64.3, R 35.7
15 - D 57.3, R 42.7
I don't think there's anyway this would be allowed because any 'fair' map would draw a minority-majority district in the Cleveland area. Thus even if the Democrats were in control of redistricting in Ohio I imagine opposition from African-American legislators would kill a proposal like this stone dead.
A fair map, which would be compact and avoid county splitting as much as possible, would look more like this:
https://davesredistricting.org/join/42f06907-df90-4796-b0c1-5223013d3874 1 - 54.95% D
2 - 67.27% R
3 - 53.09% R
4 - 69.74% R
5 - 54.97% D
6 - 64.72% R
7 - 53.19% R
8 - 71.47% D
9 - 65.30% R
10 - 60.70% R
11 - 52.37% R
12 - 51.74% R
13 - 54.42% D
14 - 82.47% D
15 - 50.50% R
Basically 5 bombproof R seats, 2 bombproof D seats, 3 likely D seats and 5 swingy/somewhat swingy seats, albeit all with a Republican lean.
The sad truth is that Ohio's geography is very much skewed towards the GOP any 'fair' map that would be drawn by a court or independent commission would ultimately reflect this.
