It's cheaper than prenatal care and maternity leave, right?
Why don't you just kill everyone over 65, everyone with a chronic illness and everyone who lives in a poor and/or industrial area? All of your healthcare cost problems solved!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11
I didn't say that this was an appropriate way to address the entire debate, it was an open-ended question about a controversial aspect of the abortion bill that I don't think either party or the media wants to touch with a hundred foot poll. Additionally, as corporations have an extreme influence in our political sphere, I'd be interested to find out if they're secretly opposing Stupak...hell, the insurance industry may support Stupak even if it lowers their profits because the abortion issue still has the potential to blow up the entire health care reform movement. I enjoy the snarky comments, I'm prone to do so myself, but I want to make clear why I posted this thread.
And , actually, yes, I think we should be discussing how much money we spent on senior health care.
Obviously I'm not advocating that we no longer treat bills with a basic sense of morality.
I'm not a pro-choice ideologue...I have a lot of sympathy for the pro-life arguments, actually, I doubt I could win a debate on the abortion issue.