Stoicism or Epicureanism? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 01:03:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Stoicism or Epicureanism? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Stoicism or Epicureanism?
#1
Stoicism
 
#2
Epicureanism
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 24

Author Topic: Stoicism or Epicureanism?  (Read 2417 times)
Georg Ebner
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 410
« on: September 22, 2017, 10:39:52 PM »

For every religious person doubtlessly Epicureanism.
Logged
Georg Ebner
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 410
« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2017, 05:25:38 AM »

For every religious person doubtlessly Epicureanism.
I'm religious and I voted for stoicism. I find their metaphysical views more palatable.
The basis of stoicism was not pagan pantheism (cf. HERDER, GOETHE), it was monism (cf. SPINOZA, HEGEL) - absolutely antireligious and antirational !!!
Logged
Georg Ebner
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 410
« Reply #2 on: September 24, 2017, 01:19:38 PM »

For every religious person doubtlessly Epicureanism.
I'm religious and I voted for stoicism. I find their metaphysical views more palatable.
The basis of stoicism was not pagan pantheism (cf. HERDER, GOETHE), it was monism (cf. SPINOZA, HEGEL) - absolutely antireligious and antirational !!!
Eh, I never said I liked monism, but I think I prefer it to the way atomists think about that thing they call 'void.'
Atomism proclaims Your divinity indirectly by making values subjective.
But Monism makes that directly - what is far more disgusting.
Logged
Georg Ebner
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 410
« Reply #3 on: September 26, 2017, 08:28:25 AM »

Also this thread is more about their life philosophies than their specific views on God.
But all "practical" ethics derives from the "theoretical" basics.
Logged
Georg Ebner
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 410
« Reply #4 on: September 28, 2017, 11:57:33 PM »

Also this thread is more about their life philosophies than their specific views on God.
But all "practical" ethics derives from the "theoretical" basics.
How would you describe them for Stoicism and Epicureanism, then?
(and I wasn't talking about ethics, I was talking about worldviews and life goals)
Epicureanism = InHalation
Stoicism = ExHalation
Logged
Georg Ebner
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 410
« Reply #5 on: September 29, 2017, 12:02:18 AM »

Stoicism. Their ethic, while a little strange is nowhere near as offensive as the Epicureans. It even has some noticeable virtue in it. Yes, the monism is also odd, but frankly from a theist view, pantheism is closer than atomism. Also, in modern America while Epicureanism is very much still alive and just as screwed up. If anything we could use a little more stoic mentality creeping into the cesspool of emotional whinging that is our current political discourse.
Indeed, Stoicism doesn't fit to Your country: Stoicism:Epicureanism=NeoPlatonism:Aristotelism=Realism:Nominalism=SU:US
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.