IA-PPP: Obama leads Huckabee by 4, Romney by 6, Gingrich by 13, Palin by 16 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 12:20:31 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  IA-PPP: Obama leads Huckabee by 4, Romney by 6, Gingrich by 13, Palin by 16 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: IA-PPP: Obama leads Huckabee by 4, Romney by 6, Gingrich by 13, Palin by 16  (Read 2229 times)
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


« on: January 12, 2011, 06:31:24 PM »

link:

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_IA_0112513.pdf

Barack Obama 47% Mike Huckabee 43%
Barack Obama 47% Mitt Romney 41%
Barack Obama 51% Newt Gingrich 38%
Barack Obama 53% Sarah Palin 37%

favorability / unfavorability:

Mike Huckabee 42%/39% for +3%.
Mitt Romney 37%/42% for -5%.
Newt Gingrich 30%/49% for -19%.
Sarah Palin 34%/59% for -25%.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2011, 06:40:18 PM »

Palin only gets the support of 67% of her fellow Republicans in an Obama-Palin matchup.  17% go to Obama, and 16% are undecided.  On the other side, Obama gets the support of 91% of Democrats.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


« Reply #2 on: January 17, 2011, 07:32:45 PM »

Why is Palin still considered a legitimate candidate? She's lost just about every poll by double digits to Obama.

What do you mean by "a legitimate candidate"?  Anyone with a decent shot at winning primaries (should they run) is going to get a decent amount of coverage, and treated seriously by the media, regardless of whether they'd do well in a general election.  I mean, Jesse Jackson got lots of media coverage in '88, as did Pat Buchanan in '96.  They both would have had no chance of winning a general election.  Palin (if she runs) would be at least as much of a "legitimate candidate" as they were.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2011, 09:17:14 PM »

Let me define "legitimacy" among candidates. If you're losing every poll by double digits (especially to Obama, who's approval ratings aren't great.) you're not a legitimate candidate to win the Presidency.

OK, and who exactly is treating Palin as a "legitimate candidate to win the Presidency", outside of her core supporters and Beet?  Most commentary on Palin seems to center around the fact that while she could win the nomination, she'd likely be crushed in the GE.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


« Reply #4 on: January 17, 2011, 09:30:26 PM »

Let me define "legitimacy" among candidates. If you're losing every poll by double digits (especially to Obama, who's approval ratings aren't great.) you're not a legitimate candidate to win the Presidency.

OK, and who exactly is treating Palin as a "legitimate candidate to win the Presidency", outside of her core supporters and Beet?  Most commentary on Palin seems to center around the fact that while she could win the nomination, she'd likely be crushed in the GE.


What candidate is supported by anyone other than their core supporters?

I'm not talking about support.  I'm talking about people's assessment of a candidate's chances of winning the presidency.  That's what you said you meant by "legitimate candidate", right?  I'm saying that, for lots of other candidates, there are quite a few people who think they would have a shot against Obama in a general election.  But in Palin's case, it's mostly just her core supporters who think that.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.