It's never good to see that anyone died, but the real tragedy here wasn't his death; the real tragedy was his life.
That says it very well.
Really no different than bin Laden's death. I mean the circumstances were pretty much the same, except bin Laden was killed by an invading force instead of the countrymen of where he was.
And any trial of Gaddafi would've been kind of a joke trial anyway with the outcome never in doubt. Not that a fair trial would have any chance of acquitting him anyway making the whole thing kind of moot, think of the trial of Saddam.
ah, there's a bit of a jump from paragraph one to two. you are correct, a Qaddafi trial would have been a foregone conclusion. as was Saddam: such is why the US/West were willing to allow Qaddafi to turn himself over. but remember, this was NOT the case with bin Laden. when the US was offered on the eve of the invasion of Afghanistan to see bin Laden handed over to a neutral party for trial, the offer was refused. because that trial would have not been a foregone conclusion. such is why he was assassinated despite being defenseless at the point of capture, and further such is why there is a distinction to be drawn between UBL and Qaddafi.