UDL Convention, December '10 (Official business complete.)

[ilikeverin]

Here's my proposal.

I agree with President and Chariman stuff, but Board should consist members that would be given certain responsibilities.

For example, Secretary, to run all the records, someone for recruitment etc. etc.

Btw, I'd love to have some duties to keep myself busy.

I think maybe that could be for the council to iron out among each other?

Now I'm imagining some sort of ironing contest between council members for supremacy.  I kind of like this idea

[ilikeverin]

[ilikeverin]

I like orange, 'cuz it reminds me of the FLP

[ilikeverin]

[1] Orange
[2] Red
[3] Salmon
[4] Purple
[5] Gold
[6] Blue
[7] Fuchsia

Party bylaws:

[ilikeverin]

I still oppose this measure; though primaries may be an interesting idea, in reality, Atlasian elections are such that running more candidates can't really hurt us.

[ilikeverin]

Argh, STOP MAKING THIS HARD, PEOPLE

A hearty *hughughug* to everyone!


Executive Council of the Union of the Democratic Left (5 seats open)

Rank the following candidates:

[1] Al
[2] Sewer
[3] Hashemite
[4] Kalwejt
[5] Polnut
[6] HappyWarrior
[7] Belgiansocialist


President of the Union of the Democratic Left

Rank the following candidates:

[1] Purple State
[2] Dr. Cynic

[ilikeverin]

Nope/Yup

[ilikeverin]

Let's go with one that doesn't have a flower.  We could always try bringing back the Progressive bull moose   Or adopt some sort of other animal.

Xahar and I would probably like to see the trilabial trill be our symbol, but that makes social interactions very awkward.

[ilikeverin]

Erm... what have I done?!?

Oh well, don't worry, it's on my hard drive, and now it's here:

[ilikeverin]

I want something like this:



It is the logo of the Left Bloc in Portugal. It's looking left and very friendly We must only change the color to orangered.

That is much preferable to any sort of flower

[ilikeverin]

I think next time we are better organized. For the next At-Large Elections we should have not more than 3 Candidates.

I don't understand this rationale.  How would any more of our candidates have been elected if we had run fewer candidates?