should flavored cigarettes be banned? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 14, 2024, 09:51:32 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  should flavored cigarettes be banned? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: should flavored cigarettes be banned?
#1
yes (lefty)
 
#2
yes (righty)
 
#3
no (lefty)
 
#4
no (righty)
 
#5
spineless moderate
 
#6
all cigarettes should be banned (authoritarian)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 49

Author Topic: should flavored cigarettes be banned?  (Read 1338 times)
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,083
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« on: September 22, 2017, 09:50:08 AM »
« edited: September 22, 2017, 09:52:35 AM by Santander »

Banning kreteks and not menthols was a disgrace. I buy Newports very occasionally when I'm drunk and want a change from Parliament lights, which are my go-to drunk cigarette, but banning menthols would probably cause the black smoking rate to plummet.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,083
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2017, 07:52:35 PM »

Marlboros are gross. Nat Sherman Naturals are the only way to go. Parliaments or Newports are fine when drunk.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,083
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #2 on: November 12, 2017, 08:27:34 PM »

I had a friend a long time ago that smoked those just so fewer people would bum smokes off of him.  It worked.

I do that with Newports. Although I guess that doesn't work in every neighborhood.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,083
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #3 on: November 12, 2017, 09:55:35 PM »

Marlboros are gross. Nat Sherman Naturals are the only way to go. Parliaments or Newports are fine when drunk.
I tried a Nat Sherman once. It took me thirty minutes to smoke. Awful.
That's called a quality cigarette. Tongue Tight pack and no chemicals to alter the burn rate!
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,083
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #4 on: November 12, 2017, 11:10:45 PM »

I had a friend a long time ago that smoked those just so fewer people would bum smokes off of him.  It worked.

I do that with Newports. Although I guess that doesn't work in every neighborhood.

When I was a smoker, I sher as heck didn’t let brands get in the way of me bumming.

Have you, um, noticed what people smoke south of 8 Mile Road?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.