2020 AZ Senate Megathread: Kelly's Race to Lose (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 11:07:39 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2020 AZ Senate Megathread: Kelly's Race to Lose (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2020 AZ Senate Megathread: Kelly's Race to Lose  (Read 74016 times)
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,916
United Kingdom


« on: December 18, 2018, 04:08:13 PM »

Also allows the Democrats to spend two years running ‘she’s a loser’ ‘she cheated her way into D.C’ ‘McSallys best friend Mitch McConelll gave her a seat’ etc before we even get to the election- adds another soft target to hit- and beyond better funding and some soft promo I can’t see what a senate seat gives her
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,916
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: December 26, 2018, 02:10:41 PM »

Woods is the person you run when you have absolutely no bench in a state but there's a host of democrats who could run. The reality that people forget is that some voters vote on ideological lines, and do so against moderates.

I'm not opposed to Woods because he's a republican- but rather because I don't think he's the most inspiring choice, and I don't think he'd stand up against the vested interests that the Democrats need to be fighting against.
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,916
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: January 18, 2019, 05:36:28 PM »

FWIW Kelly's group no doubt endorsed Toomey because he sponsored Manchin-Toomey
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,916
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2019, 05:13:39 PM »

Hey I know it goes against a fine Atlas tradition, but can't we accept that both Kelly and Gallegeo are A-list candidates, and that a healthy, and competitive primary will test both their messages, campaigns and abilities as politicians?
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,916
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2019, 02:15:04 AM »

Surely it will be on Gallego mind that if he doesn't run his only chance would be a run for Governor in 2022- as both these Senate seats could be tied up for years now.
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,916
United Kingdom


« Reply #5 on: April 16, 2020, 06:42:24 AM »

I was baffled they appointed her & surely there must be someone better in Arizona considering it's such a heavily republican state
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,916
United Kingdom


« Reply #6 on: April 16, 2020, 07:11:53 AM »

I was baffled they appointed her & surely there must be someone better in Arizona considering it's such a heavily republican state

The theory is that she got appointed specifically to lose, which would allow Ducey to run in 2022 without handing power immediately over to the democratic SoS.

The hilarous outcome of course is either her winning or Kelly winning and then beating Ducey.
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,916
United Kingdom


« Reply #7 on: May 21, 2020, 03:19:51 PM »


How can she lose when she's got both a fighter pilot necklace and an Arizona facemask?
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,916
United Kingdom


« Reply #8 on: October 09, 2020, 06:17:17 AM »

There's a funny piece of revionism about the appointment being done for Ducey to win in 2022 but that ignores the fact that if he wanted a placeholder he could have appointed someone from his staff or some hack from the local party. He then easily could have either ran in the 2020 special election or in 2024 against Sinema.

Besides it wasn't assumed that McSally would lose this race; Kelly wasn't known to be running when she was appointed & although she ran a poor campaign it wasn't this awful. If he really wanted someone to lose the seat he could have appointed someone much worse like Ward

McSally was appointed because she was seen as the strongest choice & because they hoped she could use her Senate seat to save this race in 2020.
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,916
United Kingdom


« Reply #9 on: October 18, 2020, 11:45:40 AM »


This ad also makes no sense considering that Mark Kelly is *checks notes* a fighter pilot
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,916
United Kingdom


« Reply #10 on: October 18, 2020, 02:21:04 PM »

A lot of this current republican crop got to play politics on the easy settings; depressed democratic turnout, a massive cash advantage (both direct dollars & dark money) & the easy punching bag of Obamacare.

You could say the same for the current democratic bench; tons of money, historically unpopular president & easy punching bag of pre-existing conditions.

The problem (and one that the Democrats were guilty of- see Mark Udall) is that when you're getting outraised, attacked & struggling its very easy to fall back to outlandish & stupd attacks on your opponent; politics & political journalists love a repeating story & McSally has been a repeating disaster for years.

Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,916
United Kingdom


« Reply #11 on: October 19, 2020, 01:18:27 AM »

A lot of this current republican crop got to play politics on the easy settings; depressed democratic turnout, a massive cash advantage (both direct dollars & dark money) & the easy punching bag of Obamacare.

You could say the same for the current democratic bench; tons of money, historically unpopular president & easy punching bag of pre-existing conditions.

The problem (and one that the Democrats were guilty of- see Mark Udall) is that when you're getting outraised, attacked & struggling its very easy to fall back to outlandish & stupd attacks on your opponent; politics & political journalists love a repeating story & McSally has been a repeating disaster for years.



This almost perfectly describes Susan Collins' situation in 2014, when she won a 2-1 landslide. Collins is another example of a Republican incumbent who, when confronted with a serious challenge in a competitive environment, is unable to adequately cope. Joni Ernst, of course, meets this definition as well.

Collins to her credit has actually ran statewide races which were relatively tough; but yes she was very lucky to run in two waves that were helpful (2002 & 2014) & in an era where she could coast on her brand, Maine's own weirdness as as retail politics state & a weak democratic effort.

It's more similar to Bill Nelson in my view; who had plenty of tough races but didn't seem to understand that politics had changed over the last decade.
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,916
United Kingdom


« Reply #12 on: October 24, 2020, 04:31:04 AM »

can someone give me a reason to ignore those two recent polls showing McSally winning?

I'm not being a doomer I'm just confused why there's been a relative lack of high quality polling of this race in the past week.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 12 queries.