What do YOU think should happen to the Eurozone? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 04:57:47 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  What do YOU think should happen to the Eurozone? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Just the Eurozone specifically, not the EU as a whole.
#1
It should remain as is
 
#2
Countries should give up economic autonomy for more integration
 
#3
Countries need more economic autonomy
 
#4
The weakest countries should leave
 
#5
The Euro was a mistake and should be eliminated
 
#6
Other (explain)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 63

Author Topic: What do YOU think should happen to the Eurozone?  (Read 5773 times)
Cassius
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,625


« on: August 21, 2014, 12:04:13 PM »

Ideally, the Eurozone should be eliminated. It was, after all, a fairly stupid idea to begin with. However, eliminating it would be problematic in the short-term, since Greece going back to the Drachma, Portugal going back to the Escudo and Germany going back to the Deutschmark (etc) is going to create a lot of havoc, even if, in the long-term, it may be more healthy (as you said, returning control over monetary and indeed fiscal policy to individual countries) for each country (except Germany). Alternatively, the idea of splitting the Eurozone up into different currency zones (a rough example is the north/south axiom that gets bandied about a lot) might be a more practical solution, although even then that will still have the drawback of different countries being bound together under (theoretically) one monetary policy.

Now, the idea of 'integration' and 'convergence' all sounds very nice and sensible in theory, in practice, I have doubts as to whether it can be achieved. For one thing, as has been shown by the Eurozone crisis, the idea of handing over more power to Brussels is very unpopular (at least due to its practical effects, rather than the philosophical aspects of it). The rise of eurosceptic parties (UKIP, M5S, the FN) and the eurosceptic shifts in some previously pro-European parties (the UMP et al), has been due, to a very large extent, be traced to the behaviour of the EU, the ECB etc during the economic crisis. It is clear that the EU is not popular, and the task of convincing wary electorates that more power should be handed to Brussels is not one that many governments (at least, those whose backs aren't against the wall) are going to be keen to take on.

Further more, the idea of convergence; in otherwords, the economies of the EU member states being driven together so that they are more suited to being yoked under one monetary policy, is going to be very difficult to bring about. I mean, there are plenty of member states that have failed to achieve 'convergence' within their own countries (Southern England vs parts of Northern England, East vs West Germany). Doing this on a grand scale seems to me like an impossible task.

To my way of thinking, an attempted climbdown from the Euro seems like the best solution, which is not to say that it is by any means a perfect solution, given that it will cause an awful lot of short term problems. Nonetheless, I'm not an economist, and I'm sure that other posters can give you far better analysis than I can.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 11 queries.