Cassius
YaBB God
Posts: 4,652
|
|
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2014, 05:45:56 PM » |
|
Perhaps in the case of the United States, where there is little doubt that it will be able to pay off its debts, it's a less pressing issue. On the other hand it can be disastrous for countries that find themselves unable to pay off their debts. In these situations, attempting to pay off the debt by 'growing' the economy will not work, because since they are unable to pay off their debts in the first place the country in question will need to borrow even more in order to fund initiatives to create growth. A stage will eventually be reached where creditors simply stop giving loans, and thus the whole edifice comes crashing down, as the country is in the position of having large levels of debt without the means to pay it off. That is (I believe) something like what happened to Greece. Now of course, people might say 'well austerity caused Greece's problems'. Which is to some extent true, due to the inevitable social strife that results from such economic adjustments. But, at the end of the day, the Greeks had no money to 'grow' the economy, and I'm of the opinion that it is unfair to ask the taxpayers of other countries to bail out a country like Greece, which, by and large, brought most of it's problems on itself. Thus, such 'austerity' measures are simple, brutal neccessities.
From my own point of view, a balanced budget and a low level of debt is an ideal that a government should always strive for (though of course, in certain cases such as war and bank bailouts, it is neccessary for the government to go ahead with it's actions balanced budget or no). It's simply a matter of 'safety first' (I don't like it when government's try to live dangerously), as all sorts of problems can arise when a government finds itself unable to pay off it's debts.
|