In Defense of Hillary (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 04:53:41 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  In Defense of Hillary (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: In Defense of Hillary  (Read 3957 times)
George W. Bush
eversole_Adam
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 906


« on: November 29, 2004, 10:40:26 PM »

B) She has the Clinton Machine (tm).  Yes, the Machine failed pretty miserably with Clark, but that was mainly Clark's fault, not the Clintons'.  Now they have a candidate who is obviously one of their own--so no mishaps here.  Plus the Machine (tm) ensures that some other Democrats who were helped out by the Machine [namely, Bill Richardson] don't run.

I love Hillary; don't get me wrong.  And I love Bill even more, but, honestly, Bill only won because of Perot's entrance into the 1992 election and his role in the presidential debates.  And Bill won his second term because nothing TOO scandalous had happened in his first term.  So, just to let you know, there is no such thing as the Clinton Machine.

Finnaly a Democrat that understands
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 10 queries.