Which American city (over 500,000) is the most

[Alcon]

For reference, the following cities fall into this category:

Austin
Baltimore
Boston
Charlotte
Chicago
Columbus
Dallas
Denver
Detroit
El Paso
Fort Worth
Houston
Indianapolis
Jacksonville
Las Vegas
Los Angeles
Louisville
Memphis
Milwaukie
Nashville
New York
Oklahoma City
Philadelphia
Phoenix
Portland
San Antonio
San Diego
San Francisco
San Jose
Seattle
Tucson
Washington

[Alcon]

My  picks:

Liberal: San Francisco, Seattle, Boston
Conservative: Oklahoma City, Fort Worth, Jacksonville
Libertarian: Seattle, San Jose, Tucson
Communitarian: Detroit, El Paso - not sure for third

It's worth noting that the city of Jacksonville is as big as the entire county of Duval.

[Alcon]

Liberal: Seattle

HA HA HA!

What I say:

Liberal - San Francisco, Portland, New York
Libertarian - Las Vegas, Phoenix, Tucson
Communitarian - Milwaukee, Boston, El Paso
Conservative - Oklahoma City, Dallas, Jacksonville

You obviously know absolutely nothing about the politics of Las Vegas then, so I am not sure I would trust you on Seattle either.

[Alcon]

I could say the same thing for you and Boston.

Prudish cities are not liberal.

Boston may have working-class Catholics and a communitarian lean, but it is not socially conservative.

Besides, what is your criterea for social liberalism?  Las Vegas, for example, is quite conservative on gay marriage, and probably on a number of other "prudish" issues.

Now, let's take a look at the least prudish states using the Strip Club factor (per capita):

1. West Virginia
2. Nevada
3. South Dakota
4. New Jersey
5. Alaska

Gee, West Virginia and South Dakota are exactly what I think when I think "socially liberal."

And the most prudish states?

1. New Hampshire
2. Washington
3. Mississippi
4. California
5. Maine

Of course, New Hampshire, Washington, California, and Maine!  Those bastions of social conservativism!  That makes a lot of sense!

Granted, Las Vegas may have legalised prostitution and lots of gambling.  But it isn't a social issue there!  It's an economic one.  In all reality, Nevada's population is mostly blue collar service industry workers - and they are actually rather conservative for the demographics involved.  Calling Las Vegas socially liberal is foolish; calling it economically conservative makes me think you've been watching CSI too much.

[Alcon]

Granted, Las Vegas may have legalised prostitution

Actually, I thought prostitution was only legal in rural areas in Nevada.

Sorry, you are right.  They could not, though; the county population has to be under 400,000.  Clark is currently the only one at that level, although Washoe (Reno) will soon be.

I do hope that BRTD isn't going to seriously argue that the counties in Nevada will legalised prostitution are socially liberal.  Because if they are, they must be damn conservative on everything else.

[Alcon]

I don't care about how many strip clubs there are, I've only been to 4 in my life, of those I have been to one only twice and one only once. What matters is regulations, and South Dakota has once that the local prudes are constantly trying to shut down (despite being 3 miles from the nearest town, which has only 300 people). If Seattle is so bothered by their few strip clubs that they  must pass prudish laws to regulate them, they are not socially liberal, they are just like the prudes in the Bible Belt.

Obviously, though, a place with more strip clubs per capita must have more people going to strip clubs.  That indicates that the non-prudish population is lowest in West Virginia!

It makes as much sense as assuming that Seattleites are less interested in house prices and crime rates than they are in regulating strip clubs.  As in, very little.

Besides, don't you think the huge number of other things Seattle is socially liberal on are more important than strip club legislation?  Can you name one single other "prudish" thing Seattle has done?  That is, by the way, the citizens of Seattle, not the city council like the crap you're whining about.

[Alcon]

It is worth keeping in mind that just because people are socially conservative does not mean that they are purdes, for example South America is both much more socially conservative and much less prudish than the US.

OK.

Housing prices and crime rates are not affected by lapdances or whether customers can tip strippers directly. I don't see the logic there.

I've told you a hundred times before why the city council did this.  I won't again.

I heard Seattle has some pretty horrid laws on alcohol sales too, although I don't know the specifics. And if the citizens are not prudish, they will vote the prudish City Council out. However they still have a chance in November to prove they are not prudes by rejecting that awful prudish fascist law (which by the way you said you definitely opposed and would vote no doubt vote against it if you could vote)

Most people don't care, and won't vote out City Council just because they can't touch strippers.  Seriously.

[Alcon]

My  picks:

Liberal: San Francisco, Seattle, Boston
Conservative: Oklahoma City, Fort Worth, Jacksonville
Libertarian: Seattle, San Jose, Tucson
Communitarian: Detroit, El Paso - not sure for third

It's worth noting that the city of Jacksonville is as big as the entire county of Duval.

Boston is not the liberal.  You ever see the wars that broke out up there over busing?

No.  What happened?