Nevada GOP caucus **results thread** (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 11, 2024, 11:28:33 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Nevada GOP caucus **results thread** (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Nevada GOP caucus **results thread**  (Read 51024 times)
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« on: February 04, 2012, 02:45:21 PM »

15% reporting

Romney 62%
Gingrich 16%
Paul 15%
Santorum 7%
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2012, 03:51:27 PM »
« Edited: February 04, 2012, 04:01:31 PM by Alcon »

Friendly reminder: Fewer than 1-in-5 Nevada Republicans live outside of Clark and Washoe counties.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2012, 04:09:29 PM »

Friendly reminder: Fewer than 1-in-5 Nevada Republicans live outside of Clark and Washoe counties.
But they accounted for just under 2/3 of the caucus vote in 2008 by my calculations.

Really, not some weird caucus weighting thing?  Bizarre
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2012, 06:54:19 PM »

The "very poor" are apparently not very enamored of Mittens.

Under 30k voters:
Paul 32%
Gingrich 31%
Romney 31%

"This is a classless country."

One, making under 30K does not necessarily classify you as "very poor." Two, most people under 30K are young people. When you control for the young people who support Paul, Romney wins under 30K voters by about 50-20-20 yet again.

How did you calculate that?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2012, 07:04:02 PM »

Rough estimate using CNN's exit polling. Oh, and here you go:

Uh, rough estimate using what?  Was any math involved here or were you like, "Well these numbers could be right"?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2012, 08:52:48 PM »

Storey county 53-52-48, Romney-Paul-Gingrich. That's close. Rick not far off with 35. Anyone know why Storey county is so small when it seems it's not that densely populated?

The county seat, Virginia City, was a mining boomtown.  I'd wager it was at least ten times larger sometime in the 1800s.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #6 on: February 04, 2012, 09:42:15 PM »
« Edited: February 04, 2012, 09:44:29 PM by Alcon »

I've been vaguely aware of Pahrump, Nevada for a while...but I haven't really looked at Pahrump, Nevada until today.  And on Google Maps.  Egads.

Worst reasonably populous in the United States?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #7 on: February 04, 2012, 09:52:05 PM »

Pahrump is basically for people who think Las Vegas has too many regulations.  Make of that what you will.
Sounds like the sort of place for me.

Um...look at Pahrump.  Seriously, just look at it.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #8 on: February 05, 2012, 12:25:27 AM »

Nate Silver says results + Clark County exit poll extrapolate to:

Romney 53%
Gingrich 20%
Paul 18%
Santorum 9%
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #9 on: February 05, 2012, 01:29:23 AM »


That made me laugh in public, and then I had to explain both the caucus part and the reference, and it was terrible.  Still worth it.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #10 on: February 05, 2012, 01:49:37 AM »

Don't forget there are still five precincts left in Lander County. Though I stand by my previous statement that they've probably lost these results.

BREAKING NEWS:

According to Nevada Republican Party Chairman Daniel "Danny" Tarkanian, the results were last seen "sometime around dinner," when the "[Nevada Republican Party]'s roommate must have put it in the recyclables he took out or something."
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #11 on: February 05, 2012, 01:49:59 AM »

"Hello, Nevada Republican Party. How may I help you?"

"Hi, when are your results from Clark County going to be online?"

"We're still certifying the results."

"You're just making these up, aren't you?"

"No sir, we're certifying the results."

"What are the results from the Magical Jew Caucus?"

*click*

ahahah Purple heart
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #12 on: February 05, 2012, 01:52:37 AM »

"@fivethirtyeight: Nevada GOP to release Clark County results just as soon as it figures out why Mike Tyson's tiger is in their bathroom."
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #13 on: February 05, 2012, 02:12:34 AM »

So they're actually hand counting every ballot, even though (presumably) each precinct already did their own count and phoned it in?  Didn't Iowa just rely on the phoned in counts from each precinct, and then didn't bother with doing a recount until certification, which took two weeks?  Why didn't they just do that here?  It's not like there was ever much danger of a switch in the winner of the caucus, like there was in Iowa.


The only feasible explanation I can see is that they tried that method, felt that people were screwing up results reporting, and spontaneously decided to centralize counting...it would also explain why they seem like they have like six vote counters for the entire damn county.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #14 on: February 05, 2012, 02:55:33 AM »

Lander's five missing precincts just came in.

They probably just made some sh**t up.

They actually replaced the lost results with votes for People Magazine's "Top 100 Sitcoms of the Last 50 Years," which explains Rick Santorum's surprise loss there to The King of Queens.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 11 queries.