Which would be worse to have in schools? (user search)

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? June 06, 2024, 10:06:04 AM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

General Politics

Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)

Which would be worse to have in schools? (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Poll

Question:

Which would be worse to have in schools...

#1 condoms being given to first-graders		12 (27.3%)
#2 assault rifles being given to first-graders		32 (72.7%)

Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 41

Author

Topic: Which would be worse to have in schools? (Read 3402 times)

Redefeatbush04
Jr. Member

Posts: 1,504

Re: Which would be worse to have in schools?

« on: January 23, 2005, 03:47:00 PM »

Condoms = used to prevent STD's and pregnancy from something which will happen anyway in high school

Assault Weapons = used to kill things (each other)

Logged

Redefeatbush04
Jr. Member

Posts: 1,504

Re: Which would be worse to have in schools?

« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2005, 07:39:42 PM »

Quote from: DanielX on January 23, 2005, 06:42:36 PM

To first graders? Neither. I'd rather chaperone a class field trip to Nunavut then send my *hypothetical* kid to a school that gave out either to first graders!

Hmm 2 of your last 3 posts have included Nunavut. Is there a hidden message?

Logged

Pages: [1]

Jump to:

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 14 queries.