Opinion of the Republican Party (1854-1874) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 05:59:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Opinion of the Republican Party (1854-1874) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Greatest party in American history, or greatest party in American history?
#1
Freedom Party
 
#2
Horrible Party
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 73

Author Topic: Opinion of the Republican Party (1854-1874)  (Read 2631 times)
MalaspinaGold
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 987


« on: October 19, 2014, 01:55:26 PM »

Except in the libertarian Lincoln hate, there is actually truth in it.
Logged
MalaspinaGold
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 987


« Reply #1 on: October 19, 2014, 05:43:06 PM »

Except in the libertarian Lincoln hate, there is actually truth in it.
So, opposing a war ostensibly fought against something means you support that thing? By that logic every opponent of the Iraq War was a supporter of Saddam Hussein. It's entirely possible to be a radical opponent of something and still oppose a war conducted in the name of ending that thing.
The South was part of the Union at the time; Iraq was not. Either way, this is pointless, as the South struck first.
Logged
MalaspinaGold
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 987


« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2014, 02:31:40 AM »

Except in the libertarian Lincoln hate, there is actually truth in it.
So, opposing a war ostensibly fought against something means you support that thing? By that logic every opponent of the Iraq War was a supporter of Saddam Hussein. It's entirely possible to be a radical opponent of something and still oppose a war conducted in the name of ending that thing.
The South was part of the Union at the time; Iraq was not. Either way, this is pointless, as the South struck first.
So...you're trying to argue that the Civil War was justified as a means of self-defense against the Confederacy? What does that have to do with your assertion that anyone who takes a negative view of Lincoln's actions during the Civil War is a racist?
Because very few "criticisms" of Lincoln actually hold water given the situation he was placed in. It's like Strom Thurmond and State's Rights.
Logged
MalaspinaGold
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 987


« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2014, 10:27:05 AM »

Name one.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.