Republicans Only: What should our Party be? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 04, 2024, 05:58:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Republicans Only: What should our Party be? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: What should the Republican Party be?
#1
A national, mainstream center-right coalition of conservatives, libertarians, and moderates that is dedicated to small but effective government, and recognizes that diversity is a strength
 
#2
A party with a singular conservative, pure ideology that does not vary for regional concerns, does not recognize the diversity of our country, and seeks to "change reality" rather than study and adjust for real-world needs
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 33

Author Topic: Republicans Only: What should our Party be?  (Read 6226 times)
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P

« on: January 27, 2009, 11:26:51 AM »

I think that ideological, center vs. left or center vs. right, intrastate battles miss the point, at least if the argument is about "which ideology gives us a better chance of victory?". Voters vote on the basis of results moreso than they do theories.

On the one hand, moderates have the advantage of appealing to certain voters that more extreme candidates cannot. You have to at least get an audience before you can have a chance of your message resonating, and moderates are able to get a larger audience.

On the other hand, more extreme candidates have the advantage of a more enthusiastic and mobilized base, which is more certain to turn out and perhaps more willing to stay loyal through tough times.

So, in the aggregate, these two factors generally tend to cancel each other out, generically speaking. Obviously individual candidates strengths and weaknesses are another matter.

But that's my point; most voters don't care about ideology that much (as long as the candidate is perceived as sane, anyway). They care more about results (or lack thereof) and that there is at least a reasonable effort being made to improve things, as opposed to just digging in one's heels and saying no to everything.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.