Is raising taxes good for the economy, neutral, or bad? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 08:47:33 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Is raising taxes good for the economy, neutral, or bad? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Is raising taxes good for the economy, neutral, or bad?
#1
Good
 
#2
Neutral
 
#3
Bad
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 44

Author Topic: Is raising taxes good for the economy, neutral, or bad?  (Read 6002 times)
Richard
Richius
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,369


Political Matrix
E: 8.40, S: 2.80

« on: December 20, 2004, 08:29:52 PM »

Bad.  I do not believe any form of taxation to be legal.  Levies and duties perhaps, but no taxes.
Logged
Richard
Richius
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,369


Political Matrix
E: 8.40, S: 2.80

« Reply #1 on: December 20, 2004, 09:43:58 PM »

There should be no income tax and no sales tax.
Logged
Richard
Richius
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,369


Political Matrix
E: 8.40, S: 2.80

« Reply #2 on: December 21, 2004, 08:31:37 AM »

Ah, right, I forgot about that.

I still contend that raising prices by 20% or so nationwide wouldn't be good for the economy. Yes, people would have more money to spend, but they would be discouraged froms pending due to the higher prices. People would realize that if they save and don't spend, they won't pay as much tax. If people spend less, the economy gets worse.
This is a myth.  In most European countries, the sales tax is 17.5% to 25%.  In Ontario, it is 15%.

If there is one fact of life, it is people like to spend money.  A 20% sales tax will discourage some wasteful spending, but it will encourage saving instead.  Both spending money and saving money are good for the economy in different ways.

Spending money stimulates supply and demand.  Saving money finance the current deficit and makes the united States less dependent on foreign capital.  Additionally, saving money stimulates the economy because you're injecting money into investments.  The bank can lend your money out to other people, or you can put the money you saved into bonds and stocks, which is a direct investment in the economy.

The only way saving money will not benefit the country is if you take it out of the bank and stuff it in your pillow.

The benefits gained by eliminating income taxes and the saving billions spent each year by individuals and corporations to hire consultants (who needs to know the 17,000 page tax code) will be astronomical.  The downside will be unemployment will go up initially, because the IRS and a lot of consultants and CPAs will be out of a job.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Incorrect.  The CATO Institute's study clearly shows that this is not the case.
Logged
Richard
Richius
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,369


Political Matrix
E: 8.40, S: 2.80

« Reply #3 on: December 21, 2004, 03:00:14 PM »

Not always.  I know I have been notorious for it in my time as Senator.  In the recent case, yes it would be good for the economy.  Bush cut taxes WAY too much and mostly for the wealthy.  Money multiplies better among middle class people than it does the wealthy who whorde it and contribute little.   
Way too much?  What?  Here is my tax cut I would do:

"The 16th amendment is hereby repealed."
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 12 queries.