Which of the following are protected under the First Amendment? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 14, 2024, 08:36:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Which of the following are protected under the First Amendment? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which of the following are protected under the First Amendment?
#1
Tearing up Bibles in public
 
#2
Flying a North Korean flag in front of a house
 
#3
Refusing to serve blacks at a restaurant
 
#4
Dancing naked for dollar bills
 
#5
Burning an American flag
 
#6
Burnign an effigy of Bush in public
 
#7
Hanging a banner in front of a house saying "BUSH SENT OUR SON HOME IN A BAG"
 
#8
Publicly eating pork and bacon using the Koran as a plate
 
#9
Handing out condoms outside of a Catholic church
 
#10
A band playing live swearing on stage
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 80

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Which of the following are protected under the First Amendment?  (Read 15880 times)
DanielX
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,126
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -4.70

« on: November 09, 2005, 12:00:39 AM »

All of the above activities are expressive (except 3, 4, and 9), and are in general protected speech.

However, there are a couple of points that must be kept in mind. The freedom of speech, like any other right, is subject to additional restrictions on government property. Just as there is no right to bear arms in a government building, so too is there no right to express oneself as one pleases on government property. It is perfectly permissible, therefore, for the government to ban the burning of effigies on publicly owned streets. The only rule is that these restrictions must be content-neutral. For example, the government cannot ban the burning of a Bush effigy on a publicly owned street, while permitting the burning of a Kerry effigy.

Secondly, tearing up books in public may be prohibited by littering laws, and burning objects by anti-pollution laws.

Verry expressive, although I would think 3, 4, and 9 should not be under federal jurisdiction, even if they are acceptable to regulate or ban.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.