You do realize that Schweitzer ran for Senate in 2000, right? And that was at a time when Republicans had the majority, wouldn't have had as much power
Serving in Montana for eight years gives you more perspective.
and would have had to make the controversial Iraq vote.
Which would have been a no.
He only lost to Burns by a couple of points while Bush won the state easily, so it's clear he wasn't discouraged.
His run in 2004 would have told anyone that.
He would have been stupid of course to attempt to primary Baucus or face off against Rehberg for his House seat or contend the primary with Montana St. Senate Pres. Jon Tester and it's good he didn't. But when our party needed him......when our party needed another strong candidate like Tester in Schweitzer to run for this seat and save our majority, he'll take one for the team led by Tom Daschle, but not for Harry Reid?
And I'm pretty sure if you told Robert Byrd in 2000 that his state would become a Republican stronghold in five years he'd laugh his ass off. Lots can change in politics.
Obama and the Democrats managed to bypass that Schweitzer was extremely pro-gun and has some other controversial views.
Single-payer isn't controversial. The NSA is controversial to 90% of the country, but half of that 90% ignores it when their team's in power. Trust-busting isn't controversial either.
but this was a test of Schweitzer's actual trust to Democrats and he failed, miserably. If he ran for this seat and beat Daines (it probably would be a tossup, at least) and we held the majority, then he could have been considered a potential candidate for President if Hillary declined, but not anymore.
Not repeating myself.
Democrats gave Schweitzer the chances of a lifetime and made him a national figure before, so you're dang right he's entitled to owing back the Democratic Party.
He's not a national figure. He never was a national figure. Not every American is an Atlas poster, and only political junkies and Montanans know about him. He does not owe you or Harry Reid a Senate run, and holding that against him if he runs for president (instead of making a coherent argument about his views) is just dumb.