Should Jeb get sent to the kiddie table? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 09:11:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Should Jeb get sent to the kiddie table? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should Jeb get sent to the kiddie table?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 69

Author Topic: Should Jeb get sent to the kiddie table?  (Read 1044 times)
dudeabides
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,375
Tuvalu
« on: November 21, 2015, 12:47:13 AM »

Oh please, he's in 5th of 14 candidates. Some of the anti-Bush fanatics on here crack me up. Should Ron Paul have been considered second-tier in 2012? How about Rudy Giuliani in 2008? Or even Steve Forbes in 2000. Bush should be in the main debate based on his polling.
Logged
dudeabides
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,375
Tuvalu
« Reply #1 on: November 21, 2015, 01:06:27 AM »

Anyone from the #BushCrimeFamily should be in the kiddie table debates

I have said nice things about Rand Paul and I mean them. I made the mistake of automatically assuming he was the same as his father, who by the way is a wacko who cares more about the rights of terrorists than the security of Americans and enjoyed strong support from white supremacists. I have since changed course. So this idea that because Jeb Bush is a Bush means he's just like his father and brother is silly, and the Bush's are public servants and patriots, not criminals.

The debates should really only be between Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Donald Trump, and Ben Carson, and even Ben Carson being there is debatable (AH!!!!).

I am for a debate between the adults: Bush, Rubio, Kasich, Paul, and Fiorina.  
Logged
dudeabides
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,375
Tuvalu
« Reply #2 on: November 21, 2015, 10:41:16 AM »
« Edited: November 21, 2015, 10:45:12 AM by dudeabides »

Anyone from the #BushCrimeFamily should be in the kiddie table debates

I have said nice things about Rand Paul and I mean them. I made the mistake of automatically assuming he was the same as his father, who by the way is a wacko who cares more about the rights of terrorists than the security of Americans and enjoyed strong support from white supremacists. I have since changed course. So this idea that because Jeb Bush is a Bush means he's just like his father and brother is silly, and the Bush's are public servants and patriots, not criminals.

The debates should really only be between Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Donald Trump, and Ben Carson, and even Ben Carson being there is debatable (AH!!!!).

I am for a debate between the adults: Bush, Rubio, Kasich, Paul, and Fiorina.  

Says the guy who supports statist ideals and who supports the brother of the guy who helped murdered a million plus Iraqis on false pretenses and nearly wrecked our economy....

Saying that Jeb is unfit to be President because his brother did this that or the other is basically the equivalent of saying Kennedy was unfit to be President because his Dad advocated throwing in the towel to Nazi Germany in the early stages of the Second World War.

This

Also I hate to break it to you dudeabides but no one wants another Bush presidency it's pretty evident in the polls and endorsements and the sooner you realize that the better it will be not just for you but for every one else aa well.

Anyone from the #BushCrimeFamily should be in the kiddie table debates

I have said nice things about Rand Paul and I mean them. I made the mistake of automatically assuming he was the same as his father, who by the way is a wacko who cares more about the rights of terrorists than the security of Americans and enjoyed strong support from white supremacists. I have since changed course. So this idea that because Jeb Bush is a Bush means he's just like his father and brother is silly, and the Bush's are public servants and patriots, not criminals.

The debates should really only be between Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Donald Trump, and Ben Carson, and even Ben Carson being there is debatable (AH!!!!).

I am for a debate between the adults: Bush, Rubio, Kasich, Paul, and Fiorina.  

Says the guy who supports statist ideals and who supports the brother of the guy who helped murdered a million plus Iraqis on false pretenses and nearly wrecked our economy....

The polls show he's not the front-runner, but he is still in the top 5 or 6 of 14.

Also, I don't support any statist ideas. George W. Bush fought for the policy that LIBERATED 25 million Iraqis, prevented crimes against humanity from continuing, and he made this country safer. As for the economy, Bush didn't do enough to prevent Clinton's housing bubble from collapsing, though he did try to break up Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

I know the left-wing media has tried to sell you conspiracy theories about the Bush's, but you can't believe everything you hear or read.
Logged
dudeabides
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,375
Tuvalu
« Reply #3 on: November 21, 2015, 02:15:22 PM »

Maybe we shouldn't be using sound-byte debates as the major way to winnow candidates.

Then you have to exclude Trump and Cruz.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.