SR 113-24: Judicial Reform Amendment (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 04:47:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SR 113-24: Judicial Reform Amendment (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SR 113-24: Judicial Reform Amendment (Passed)  (Read 3935 times)
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,817
United States


« on: February 19, 2023, 04:16:02 AM »

Quite honestly, Mr. Reactionary, I supported this amendment, but the fact is, a good legislative leader knows when to admit defeat on a bill. That you have refused to do so, and are refusing to acknowledge a motion to table that almost certainly would pass, is disturbing.
Logged
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,817
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 19, 2023, 12:36:38 PM »

Quite honestly, Mr. Reactionary, I supported this amendment, but the fact is, a good legislative leader knows when to admit defeat on a bill. That you have refused to do so, and are refusing to acknowledge a motion to table that almost certainly would pass, is disturbing.

Motions to table require a 2nd. No second was made.

Quote
1.) Any Senator can, during a period of debate, with the support of one other Senator, introduce a motion to table the legislation.

I accept your apology.

Obviously that section of Senate rules should be changed.

But yes, I was wrong. The legislation still should be tabled though. It's clearly not going to pass in any form.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 11 queries.