Shri Thanedar? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 06:33:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Shri Thanedar? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Shri Thanedar?  (Read 7301 times)
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,817
United States


« on: April 26, 2018, 07:10:04 PM »

Thanedar may not even be eligible to be on the ballot, as he was on a "voter termination countdown" after being registered to vote in New York City as of 2015...but not terminating his Michigan registration.
Logged
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,817
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2018, 09:36:23 PM »

Not to explode this thread too much with the shrapnel of the Hoyer thread, but this race is absolutely one in which the party should weigh in against a candidate with little chance of winning the general - Thanedar. He's an abysmal candidate, with little discernable ideological base/lane who's only winning because $$. Nominating Thanedar would be throwing away a winnable governor's mansion.

Not to mention that, evidently, he considered running as a Republican. This is not a race where we should have to settle for someone like this.

Thanedar may not even be eligible to be on the ballot, as he was on a "voter termination countdown" after being registered to vote in New York City as of 2015...but not terminating his Michigan registration.

That was Abdul El-Sayed iirc.

Whoops... either way, it just proves Whitmer is easily the strongest candidate for Democrats.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.