muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
Posts: 16,802
|
 |
« on: July 16, 2016, 05:21:23 PM » |
|
|
« edited: July 16, 2016, 05:23:04 PM by muon2 »
|
It's an interesting premise, but there is a counter example in the one-man-one vote decision for congressional districts (Wesberry v Sanders). SCOTUS did not apply it to the Senate, though by the logic of the article it seems they should have. Since SCOTUS did not apply equal protection to the Senate, I think they also would not apply it to qualifications for federal offices, including requiring presidents to be natural born citizens.
|
Poll
