Should banning things be banned?

[7,052,770]

Yes, finally. Goddamn it.

So you really think that NOTHING should be banned?  You've got to be kidding me...

[7,052,770]

Yes, finally. Goddamn it.

So you really think that NOTHING should be banned?  You've got to be kidding me...

Thanks for putting words in my mouth.

How did I put words into your mouth?  You answered yes to the questions, and added a GD for emphasis.

[7,052,770]

Yes, finally. Goddamn it.

So you really think that NOTHING should be banned?  You've got to be kidding me...

Thanks for putting words in my mouth.

How did I put words into your mouth?  You answered yes to the questions, and added a GD for emphasis.

You asked me a question I'd yet to answer, and then you wrote "you've got to be kidding me", as if I'd agreed.

You said:  "Yes, finally. Goddamn it." which pretty clearly implies that you have answered the question.  If somehow it does not and you actually have "yet to answer", then I apologize for any offense, even though I don't really follow how you can answer yes to a question but not answer it.

[7,052,770]

You asked me if I think NOTHING should be banned, and at that point I didn't answer yet. I answered "Yes, finally" to the thread question in a humorous way. [/semantic argument]

Well...ok...  Normally, when someone says "yes" in a thread with a yes/no poll question, it is interpreted as saying "yes" to the poll, so that is why I thought you were saying yes to the question.