Urban-rural divide on steroids (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 11:43:16 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Urban-rural divide on steroids (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Urban-rural divide on steroids  (Read 1644 times)
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,919
United States


P P
« on: November 16, 2018, 12:45:43 AM »

I made a county map of the midwest of what I think a possible future presidential election could look like with further urban-rural division.

Midwest + Pennsylvania



Dark Red = >60% R
Red = <60% R
Blue = <60% D
Dark Blue = >60% D

Consider the average dark red and dark blue county 70-75% R or D. My formula for constructing this map was pretty much 50% 2016 trends and 50% pure rural-urban divide. In this scenario imagine Waukesha County WI barely going Republican and Hamilton Indiana barely going Democratic.

I was wondering if this type of map is realistic going forward? A map with trends more heavily weighted on how densely populated the county is and its proximity to a major metropolitan area, more than the college education aspect.

This is an alarming map, one that I hope will not come to pass. But unfortunately, I think we are headed on that trajectory. Do you think this will eventually be the map in Senatorial and gubernatorial elections as well?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 10 queries.