Would Pussygate have been more damaging against another candidate? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 09:15:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Would Pussygate have been more damaging against another candidate? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Would pussygate have been more damaging to trump against another democrat?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 76

Author Topic: Would Pussygate have been more damaging against another candidate?  (Read 3796 times)
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,092
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

« on: April 04, 2019, 05:05:27 PM »

I think had Trump been running against another male candidate, it would have been more effective. As f[inks]d as it sounds, the fact that Hillary was a woman (and the fact that so many disliked her) contributed to a climate of dismissal and reactionary response, leading to a more overtly sexist reaction to it. Basically, "well, she's a woman, so of course she's going to have a problem with it".

A better yet less stark contrast (a male sex predator versus a male who isn't a sex predator) could have addressed this in a way that wouldn't subconsciously seem like it was a personal reaction. People are generally more responsive to criticisms and policy changes in the political arena when the people who are advocating for it aren't directly affected by it (for better or worse).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 13 queries.