Would Pussygate have been more damaging against another candidate? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 06:21:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Would Pussygate have been more damaging against another candidate? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Would pussygate have been more damaging to trump against another democrat?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 76

Author Topic: Would Pussygate have been more damaging against another candidate?  (Read 3793 times)
AtorBoltox
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,107


« on: April 02, 2019, 06:15:30 AM »

Although he did take a hit in the polls for a time, Trump was able to recover from Pussygate by election day mainly by deflecting to the accusations against Bill Clinton. If Trump was facing another candidate who could not be attacked for this hypocrisy however, would the controversy over pussygate been more damaging, or are Republicans so far gone they would ignore and excuse his comments under all circumstances?
Logged
AtorBoltox
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,107


« Reply #1 on: April 03, 2019, 06:41:21 PM »

Yes, Trump is a known playboy, people weren't surprised.

Mike Pence? He'd get rocked and lose Lean R states at least.
You misunderstood the question. I'm asking if it would have been more damaging if trump was facing a different democratic opponent who didn't have to deal in any with their own unsavory history on sexual assault
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 13 queries.