No way Biden's up 16 in MN. Most I would say is 4.
"Poll disagrees with my priors, therefore it is wrong."
I mean, I'd gladly take the "under" on a Biden +10 over/under in MN, and a Biden +17 from Gravis isn't changing my mind.
Looking at the 538 and Economist models, that looks like about an even bet at the moment.
TBH, I don't think Biden's up by 16 in MI either. But a ceiling of +4 there, which is what Jopow claims, is also ridiculous.
MN was R+1 in 2016, so if nothing changed and Biden is up by like 9 now you'd expect him to be ahead by 8 in MN. My guess is Minnesota isn't trending much either way but who knows.
Oddly enough, 538 has Minnesota's elasticity coefficient slightly higher than 1. I always thought they were inelastic.
So, this seems reasonable.