Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 08:28:59 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea?
#1
yes (D)		  
#2
no (D)		  
#3
yes (R)		  
#4
no (R)		  
#5
yes (I)		  
#6
no (I)		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 27

Author Topic: Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea?  (Read 1847 times)
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,269
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« on: March 24, 2012, 05:29:38 AM »
It is racist, but it's not a problem since dog races do exist, while human races don't.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,269
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #1 on: March 24, 2012, 11:52:37 AM »
Quote from: You Are The Resistance on March 24, 2012, 10:19:01 AM
Yeah, it's basically "racist" if that's the term we're using.

We don't have laws that label particular human races as dangerous, because that would cause mass public hysteria, so why have laws that label certain dogs as dangerous?

Sigh...

Because  there's not such a thing as "human races". That's why.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.