"I Miss Him Every Day" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 07:29:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  "I Miss Him Every Day" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: "I Miss Him Every Day"  (Read 6085 times)
America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,746


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
« on: April 20, 2018, 04:25:12 PM »

1. Your last post seems to have 2019 listed a bunch of times, when you probably intended to list 2020.

2. What was the 2018 result in this timeline?
Logged
America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,746


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
« Reply #1 on: April 20, 2018, 06:28:51 PM »

1. Your last post seems to have 2019 listed a bunch of times, when you probably intended to list 2020.

2. What was the 2018 result in this timeline?

Mistake fixed, thanks for noticing! Lol

This timeline is fairly assuming the "Blue Wave" happened. Notably, Heitkamp and Warren won, and Texas did flip Blue.

Exact Senate/House/Gubernatorial Results?

I assume Senate is D+4 here based on what you said (defend everything, take TN, TX, AZ, and NV).
Logged
America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,746


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
« Reply #2 on: April 20, 2018, 06:50:03 PM »

I guess Franken's misconduct wasn't exposed. I wonder if it will be.
Why do you say that?
Logged
America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,746


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
« Reply #3 on: April 20, 2018, 06:52:36 PM »

I guess Franken's misconduct wasn't exposed. I wonder if it will be.
Why do you say that?

He is running for President in this timeline circa 2020.

He never said that anywhere in this timeline.
Logged
America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,746


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
« Reply #4 on: April 23, 2018, 10:20:28 AM »

Kenned/Kander! Could also live with Kennedy/Harris or Kennedy/Moulton, the rest are bad choices (especially Gabbard but also Clinton or Sandberg).

"especially Gabbard"

As a Gabbard fanboy myself, I must ask - why do people dislike/avoid her?

I don't understand how she's not one of the most realistically electable, and respectable Democrats in the Party right now.

In addition to what JFK said, I'd say that the overall foreign policy makes me very suspicious. I think there's a worldwide movement of politicians supportive of Putin and Assad over U.S. and allies like Israel, even in the west, but those in the west are often kinda vague about it, like Gabbard and Kucinich. I find this movement very dangerous. So Gabbard is a huge "no" for me, I'd probably vote for generic R over her.

This is not necessarily an either or debate. Some people simultaneously believe that Putin, Assad, and Netanyahu are all very bad people.

Personally, I would consider all 3 of them to be war criminals.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 10 queries.