(Early October 2020) Plausible ceiling for Trump
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 04:52:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  (Early October 2020) Plausible ceiling for Trump
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: What's the plausible ceiling for Trump at this point?
#1
Trump cannot win
 
#2
Trump wins anywhere from 270-299 electoral votes
 
#3
Trump wins anywhere from 300-320 electoral votes
 
#4
Trump wins anywhere from 320-350 electoral votes
 
#5
Trump wins with over 350 electoral votes
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 66

Author Topic: (Early October 2020) Plausible ceiling for Trump  (Read 574 times)
Chips
Those Chips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,209
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 04, 2020, 09:48:58 PM »

Inspired by the other thread.

Here's mine.



325 electoral votes.
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,938


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2020, 09:51:11 PM »

If you give every state where Trump has a greater than 1% of winning in my model to him, you get a Trump win 350-188. 188 I think is a pretty fair ceiling at this point
Logged
It’s so Joever
Forumlurker161
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,039


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 04, 2020, 10:05:02 PM »

Inspired by the other thread.

Here's mine.



325 electoral votes.
Agreed for the most part, but I would switch CO and MN. There is a reason Trump just stopped trying here.
Logged
TC 25
Rookie
**
Posts: 236
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 04, 2020, 10:28:39 PM »

Best case for Trump

Retains all 306 EV from 2016, plus:
* MN (10); NV (6); NH (4)

326 is the ceiling.
Logged
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,946
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 04, 2020, 10:35:21 PM »
« Edited: October 04, 2020, 10:38:26 PM by Orser67 »

Honestly, I think it's his 2016 map, though MI, NH, NV, and maybe MN are kind of on the borderline for me.



Biden 50%
Trump 47%
Other 3%
Logged
Buzz
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,186


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 04, 2020, 10:39:19 PM »

2016 map + NH, MN, and NV
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 04, 2020, 10:48:28 PM »

2016 - MI
Logged
Turbo Flame
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 422


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 05, 2020, 12:59:45 PM »

Trump is now unlikely going to win, but even before he caught covid, this was my ceiling
Logged
Ferguson97
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,294
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 05, 2020, 01:03:33 PM »

2016 minus WI/PA/MI/NE-02


Logged
Darthpi – Anti-Florida Activist
darthpi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,707
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.13, S: -6.87

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 05, 2020, 01:07:59 PM »

The only Clinton 2016 state that seems remotely in play is Nevada, and even that seems like a stretch. That would put Trump's ceiling at 312, assuming we consider all Trump 2016 states as still viable for Trump.

Worth noting that I would put the chances of Trump hitting that ceiling at under 5%.
Logged
TiltsAreUnderrated
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,774


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 05, 2020, 01:29:36 PM »

2016 + MN + NV
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.228 seconds with 13 queries.