Congressional Special Elections Results Thread (OLD, PLEASE UNSTICKY)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 08:42:04 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Congressional Special Elections Results Thread (OLD, PLEASE UNSTICKY)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 ... 69
Author Topic: Congressional Special Elections Results Thread (OLD, PLEASE UNSTICKY)  (Read 202288 times)
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,641
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #300 on: April 11, 2017, 07:40:12 PM »

Not to rain on all the Democrats' hopes here, but didn't Trump get massacred in the early vote in Florida, North Carolina, st al, only to slaughter Clinton even worse in Election Day voting?

He lost the early vote in both, yes, but I wouldn't say he got massacred. The early vote was about 6-7% more D friendly than the eventual results, IIRC.

If that's reflected here, assuming what we have is representative of all the early vote, we should see a 0-1% Thompson win Tongue

Could be a barn-burner, folks.
Logged
McGovernForPrez
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,073


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #301 on: April 11, 2017, 07:40:50 PM »

If this seat is actually even competitive, then Democrats look poised to win control of the House and maybe even (somehow, despite the map) the Senate in the 2018 midterms.

There is a path to winning the senate. It's called forcing out McCaskill for Kander in Missouri, and winning a three-way (McMullin as Indy) in Utah.
Possibly upset Beto in TX? If Thompson wins this I wouldn't rule it out of the realms of possibility.
Logged
Chief Justice Keef
etr906
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,100
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #302 on: April 11, 2017, 07:41:29 PM »

In hindsight, now that Thompson might actually have a real shot at this...

Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,092
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #303 on: April 11, 2017, 07:41:41 PM »

Stop getting me all excited, people. Now I have to commit to sitting at my computer for the next few hours pressing refresh instead of, you know, eating and doing taxes.

Now I'm sitting here getting all liquored up instead of doing my at-dusk exercising.

Could there be a more fitting drink for me to have?

Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,838
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #304 on: April 11, 2017, 07:42:24 PM »

If this seat is actually even competitive, then Democrats look poised to win control of the House and maybe even (somehow, despite the map) the Senate in the 2018 midterms.

There is a path to winning the senate. It's called forcing out McCaskill for Kander in Missouri, and winning a three-way (McMullin as Indy) in Utah.
Possibly upset Beto in TX? If Thompson wins this I wouldn't rule it out of the realms of possibility.

I'll believe it when I see it with TX after Hillary did worse than Obama '08 in terms of % of the vote despite maxing out the urban areas.
Logged
MAINEiac4434
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,269
France


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #305 on: April 11, 2017, 07:42:46 PM »

If this seat is actually even competitive, then Democrats look poised to win control of the House and maybe even (somehow, despite the map) the Senate in the 2018 midterms.

There is a path to winning the senate. It's called forcing out McCaskill for Kander in Missouri, and winning a three-way (McMullin as Indy) in Utah.
Possibly upset Beto in TX? If Thompson wins this I wouldn't rule it out of the realms of possibility.
I mean, if Kansas-04 is swinging this hard against Trump, and assuming Trump doesn't right the ship and up his approvals, anything is possible.
Logged
Confused Democrat
reidmill
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,055
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #306 on: April 11, 2017, 07:42:52 PM »

I bet the DCCC regrets not investing heavily in this race.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,385
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #307 on: April 11, 2017, 07:43:05 PM »

Not to rain on all the Democrats' hopes here, but didn't Trump get massacred in the early vote in Florida, North Carolina, st al, only to slaughter Clinton even worse in Election Day voting?

He lost the early vote in both, yes, but I wouldn't say he got massacred. The early vote was about 6-7% more D friendly than the eventual results, IIRC.

Really? What was FL? I recall the EV there being ugly for Trump.

 From that observation, I'm starting to suspect Estes is toast.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,133
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #308 on: April 11, 2017, 07:44:29 PM »

It'll be close, perhaps my bold prediction was not as bold as I thought.
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,478
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #309 on: April 11, 2017, 07:44:48 PM »

I bet the DCCC regrets not investing heavily in this race.

Thompson localized the race at made it more of a referendum on Brownback than on Trump or Congressional Republicans. I don't think ties to the national party would've helped all that much.
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #310 on: April 11, 2017, 07:44:56 PM »

the EV in fl wasn't so bad for trump.

he got beaten in the last week, as usual, but not even close to obama territory and needed much too long.

Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,666
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #311 on: April 11, 2017, 07:45:04 PM »

It will be close, but Estes will win. But he is not off the hook in 2018.
Logged
McGovernForPrez
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,073


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #312 on: April 11, 2017, 07:45:55 PM »

If this seat is actually even competitive, then Democrats look poised to win control of the House and maybe even (somehow, despite the map) the Senate in the 2018 midterms.

There is a path to winning the senate. It's called forcing out McCaskill for Kander in Missouri, and winning a three-way (McMullin as Indy) in Utah.
Possibly upset Beto in TX? If Thompson wins this I wouldn't rule it out of the realms of possibility.

I'll believe it when I see it with TX after Hillary did worse than Obama '08 in terms of % of the vote despite maxing out the urban areas.
Well any Beto win would come from a suburban defection. Also it's not fair to compare Obama's +6 or +7 win to Hillary's +2 win and say she did worse. Relative to national trends she did much better than Barry. Still I'd still say TX is at likely to lean R even of Thompson wins.
Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,092
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #313 on: April 11, 2017, 07:46:15 PM »

Not to rain on all the Democrats' hopes here, but didn't Trump get massacred in the early vote in Florida, North Carolina, st al, only to slaughter Clinton even worse in Election Day voting?

He lost the early vote in both, yes, but I wouldn't say he got massacred. The early vote was about 6-7% more D friendly than the eventual results, IIRC.

Really? What was FL? I recall the EV there being ugly for Trump.

 From that observation, I'm starting to suspect Estes is toast.

If I recall correctly, Dems only had a net EV advantage of a point or two - but people read into this as being good considering the net Dem advantage they had in 2012 was less (or non-existent?) in early voting and Obama still eeked out a win + believing the losses in D registration over the past four years were merely Romney '12 voters finally flipping their registrations.
Logged
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,771


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #314 on: April 11, 2017, 07:46:32 PM »

I still think Estes will squeak this out, but this is simply embarrassing!
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,764
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #315 on: April 11, 2017, 07:46:39 PM »

Ryan Struyk @ryanstruyk  
Early returns in Sedgwick County show strongest Trump precincts coming in weaker for Estes. Strongest Clinton stronger for Thompson. #KS04

Ryan Struyk‏ @ryanstruyk
GO - Trump 68%, Estes 56%
DB42 - Trump 67%, Estes 57%
410 - Trump 67%, Estes 49%
GY01 - Trump 70%, Estes 53%
531 - Trump 67%, Estes 53%

Ryan Struyk @ryanstruyk
Some core Dem precincts in Wichita, still very early:
116 - Clinton 89%, Thomp 97%
117 - Clinton 90%, Thomp 98%
118 - Clinton 82%, Thomp 94%

Some precincts voting nearly 100% Thompson. lol
Logged
bilaps
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,789
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #316 on: April 11, 2017, 07:47:09 PM »

This is going so sloooow
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,299
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #317 on: April 11, 2017, 07:47:46 PM »

Not to rain on all the Democrats' hopes here, but didn't Trump get massacred in the early vote in Florida, North Carolina, st al, only to slaughter Clinton even worse in Election Day voting?

He lost the early vote in both, yes, but I wouldn't say he got massacred. The early vote was about 6-7% more D friendly than the eventual results, IIRC.

Really? What was FL? I recall the EV there being ugly for Trump.

 From that observation, I'm starting to suspect Estes is toast.

I believe Clinton started out about 6% ahead of Trump in FL, so again, that would have made the EV roughly 7% more Democratic than the eventual results. I have no idea if that will be the case with this race, though. I don't want to jump to conclusions too quickly.
Logged
MAINEiac4434
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,269
France


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #318 on: April 11, 2017, 07:48:10 PM »

From what I gather....turnout is abysmal without Trump on the ballot

Estes is basically seen as Brownback
I can understand that...Trump brought a lot of nonvoters out of the woodwork. But without Trump on the ballot, they don't get out. A bit like nonvoting Obama supporters.
Logged
henster
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,010


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #319 on: April 11, 2017, 07:48:21 PM »

What if Ds end up winning KS-04 and MT-AL but lose GA-06 what message would that send to the DCCC?
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,133
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #320 on: April 11, 2017, 07:48:28 PM »

I bet the DCCC regrets not investing heavily in this race.
i don't think the old, "Hey kids, it's Nancy from SF!" would've helped that much.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,540
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #321 on: April 11, 2017, 07:48:36 PM »

I bet the DCCC regrets not investing heavily in this race.

They staying out helped the expectations game.
Logged
Classic Conservative
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,628


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #322 on: April 11, 2017, 07:48:48 PM »

Are Kansas primaries open or closed? The reason I'm asking is that if they are closed, that could explain why Thompson did so good with registered R's in the early vote.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,900


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #323 on: April 11, 2017, 07:48:58 PM »

What if Ds end up winning KS-04 and MT-AL but lose GA-06 what message would that send to the DCCC?

"Special elections are special."
Logged
InheritTheWind
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 298


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #324 on: April 11, 2017, 07:49:09 PM »

What if Ds end up winning KS-04 and MT-AL but lose GA-06 what message would that send to the DCCC?

Rural voters are far more elastic than their suburban counterparts?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 ... 69  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 9 queries.